Rorschach
Sonny Walters
If looks could kill...
If looks could kill...
If looks could kill...
Nothing really to do with hart per se here, but this role in dressing room rubbish needs to stop.
Thats hart, Sissoko, moura, harry, dier and son all "playing a role" or "good in the dressing room", or "vocal". Not to mention jose "the winner".
Well i don't see it, and i certainly did not see it for vast amounts of last season, not where it counts anyway, on the pitch, and definitely not when it counts.
We, as a club, seem to put way to much store on this rubbish, which when it is clearly not working, is bizarre and very damaging.
Hart (anong others) isn't good enough, keeping him around because he is popular sends out a bad message.
It leads to complacency and slackness.
Having a good workplace cannot be understated, if you have ever worked in any high pressure environment it can be absolutely a difference maker.
Delivering results is a different thing, and while you can build a mentality for success, it isn't necessarily the same as creating a good working environment, which can help motivation, help new players settle in and bring younger players through.
Arseholes can succeedTotally get that, but as i say it isn't whatever some these guys are supposed to bringing to the team isn't translating to results.
I go back to jose in the tv show with Sissoko.
Is the drop off in quality on the pitch worth keeping Sissoko for some bantz in tge dressing room?
Harry alludes to it in his interview, if we want to fulfil our ambitions and win the priority should be good players, not good characters.
And can anyone say harry isn't driven, yet you wont find anyone saying hes not a good guy.
There are good guys out there who are quality players and winners.
We should not be judging on whether we keep or dutch players based on their dressing room antics.
Especially as it does not seem to be working.
Arseholes can succeed
A LOT and successful people are narcissists and borderline psychopaths
Our players are just too fudging nice
I want good guys and to be proud of the morals of our team and club.
But if they aren't good enough on the pitch, and imvho neither hart, Sissoko or dier are, then them being good guys doesn't justify keeping them.
Not if we want to win trophies.
Yeah but there's the point
- good player +good for team morale/environment = keep
- not good enough as a player = move on (e.g. I could give a brick of Dier's impact on dressing room, he's a disaster on pitch, so got to go)
But this started with Hart, who to me is such a bit part player, that moving him on (with all the other deadwood) simply isn't a priority, similar to the end of Vorm
's time with us, was he good enough? = no, but the actually playing time he would get meant that move could wait.
What strikes me is the amount of International players in that clip who normally would be still involved in or recovering after tournaments. I think it shows how many of our players have stagnated or regressed over the past year or so. Hopefully the free summer will have done them some good.
Absolutely. For most of the season, our team looked unfit. Disinterested, unmotivated and unfit. I saw a group of players who have been together for too long and worked too hard without winning anything. Say what you want about Mourinho, but no manager could have fixed that without throwing the worst apples out. If you can't be motivated by being top of the league, nothing can.I think it is the biggest damnation of Mourinho's tenure. He allowed a lot of sharp players to get blunt, both performance and fitness wise.
Absolutely. For most of the season, our team looked unfit. Disinterested, unmotivated and unfit. I saw a group of players who have been together for too long and worked too hard without winning anything. Say what you want about Mourinho, but no manager could have fixed that without throwing the worst apples out. If you can't be motivated by being top of the league, nothing can.
Its a nebulous role at best, and one that i can see no signs of working at the club.
And if that role is the difference between keeping them or shipping them out then i would suggest evidence points to it not working.
As i said, this isn't about hart per se, but what kind of message does it send out to the squad if we won't bin off inferior players because they are "good in the dressing room".
Who do you want on the pitch beside you when it matters, Sissoko, good guy and a great laugh, but not very good.
Or a guy like glc or lamela. Can play a bit, gives it their all but is maybe a more intense and quiet character.
I know who i would want, but we seem to always go for the good guy, at our cost.
The environment we create does not seem to mirror our ambition.
Most.Arseholes can succeed
A LOT and successful people are narcissists and borderline psychopaths
Our players are just too fudging nice
I agree in principle. But at the same time the more attributes you want in one player the harder they are to find and get.But we have several who imo their value in the dressing room is negated by their lack of value where it counts, on the pitch.
If hart, Sissoko or dier are great in the dressing room then employ them as party planner or something and give their place in the squad who can improve the team.
Would you take ramos for those threes combined salary plus say £50k a week?
I fudging would, and I bet it would improve us.
And anyone complaining about the loss of his mates can fudge off, they all want a move "to win things". Well we aren't winning anything with this guys.
Eh.? Probably because Dier was originally a defender. It was Poch that converted him to a DCM to save us buying one after Mason/Bentaleb.What about Dier we don't give Sissoko an extended run at CB to see if he can come good. What's so special about him off the pitch that gives him the privilege?
Sent from my SM-G998B using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app
What about Dier we don't give Sissoko an extended run at CB to see if he can come good. What's so special about him off the pitch that gives him the privilege?
Sent from my SM-G998B using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app
Yeah but there's the point
- good player +good for team morale/environment = keep
- not good enough as a player = move on (e.g. I could give a brick of Dier's impact on dressing room, he's a disaster on pitch, so got to go)
But this started with Hart, who to me is such a bit part player, that moving him on (with all the other deadwood) simply isn't a priority, similar to the end of Vorm
's time with us, was he good enough? = no, but the actually playing time he would get meant that move could wait.