Thanks. That was interesting.
1st thing that hit me from that interview is that he has cliché answers to cliché questions. That I don't mind that at all, as journos mostly ask really brick questions and they only deserve stock answers in response, especially if they are repeating a question already asked. Red top fodder.
The 2nd thing is that struck me is he is hedging on Kane, unsurprisingly. Lots of positive non-commital comments.
3rd is that the few questions he actually responded to (that were not stock answers) shows he is a smart man with a realistic understanding as to where the club is right now. That gives me more comfort than the chewing gum answers.
I like him.
Agree, it was very much politician answers. Noncommittal. But ones that actually made you like him. Very well done.