@Raziel what's your background as a Spurs fan out of interest? I know you were US based but are you UK born amd that's where your support comes from or what? I'm finding it hard to rationalise your posts onthis subject tbh
I don't disagree with what you say wrt how the modern game is going and where the money is and of course i can understand why the club is going to chase whichever revenue is highest (STs vs TV vs Streaming etc) but that doesn't mean I'm going to accept/be happy with being marginalised as a match going supporter - because when all is said and done TV and foreign support is transient, local support will be here longer after they have moved on once the bubble has burst - clubs need to find the balance because i won't be happy seeing the club taken in a direction that we the match going support don't want it to.
If the club decided to upsticks and play in a version of the ESL based in a foreign counrty because that is where the money is and it would make the most financial sense then i get the impression based on what you have posted so far on this topic you'd welcome the move and argue it makes sense for the club to remain part of the elite and that the as the fanbase is global the club aren't doing anything wrong
Let me try to answer (perhaps too long and much too personal but hey, you asked)
- I've lived in 9 countries, worked in 6 (long story)
- Not born in UK, but some of my family is from.
- Been a Spurs fans since the early 80's
- Not that it means anything but I've flown back to see games pretty much every year since 2009 (also seen us play in multiple countries)
- Back in London now, got my season tickets
- As humbly as I can say it, I work with/for significantly bigger companies than Spurs and often look at it from a business perspective
Re some of the other stuff
- No, I would not support the club moving or leaving the PL (both of those in my opinion are red herring arguments/fear mongering, because ESL has some components of American sport does not mean clubs suddenly move, for many reasons but as example in American sport often the the stadium doesn't belong to the club as vs. here where we/everyone have an asset on the books for 30 years)
- I loved WHL and the atmosphere of a CL night there, but I'm also ok with the fact that part of our progress has different type of fans (e.g. the Korean fans that fly all the way to London and spend a lot of money on tickets/merch/etc. Perhaps I identify because for years that was me)
- I'm not a football fan, I'm a Spurs fan and pragmatic (I'm not going to believe we are going to fix FIFA/FA/UEFA anytime soon)
- Part of Spurs success is the change, yes (like it or not) casuals, corporate (who will pay the price of car for a season ticket) and overseas have to be a key part of the business plan, even over the "local"/traditional supporter.
What I want to see is Spurs successful, win something. To do that there are two routes
- The club is successful as a business and takes that and translates into on field success (I have no expectations of Spurs being United size, winning trophies every year but occasional success and being part of the top clubs will do)
- We get a sugar daddy (I'd prefer option 1 but am comfortable enough with my inner hypocrite to know I'd still support even enjoy our wins)
My frustration around this topic is regardless of if it's the Trust, other supporters, the media, it's all the same view
- fear mongering -> ESL will cause teams in the championship to die, really how the fudge do you make that connection, same for us suddenly becoming "insert US city" Spurs (word of advice, when people have to appeal to your anger or make tenuous connections -> you are being played, and the entire UK fanbase became stooges to protect Sky/BT/UEFA revenue and the current imbalance in the game)
- More fear mongering above, ESL top clubs would have asked for more share = no, they wouldn't, there was 23 year business model with guarantees (what the clubs want), and this is supporter lack of business understanding kicking in. The top 15 clubs on even footing is ok (only Chelsea/CIty/PSG/Bayern who all have a huge advantage today would be upset with that), again real world, the top banks don't see each other as competitors (they have been competing with each other as long as some football clubs), it's someone outside coming in that is the concern (the "uber" of every business threat)
- problem without solution or help. The club has financial challenges it did not make with Covid, has the Trust, this board, any fudging supporter said -> hey, maybe we (anyone who can) all buy an extra kit this season? no, lets bitch about ESL, demand ticket price freezes and call Levy a cheap fudge when he doesn't buy 10 more players this summer.
- An external to domestic league football without relegation/promotion bad! why? = bad, mutter, game dying, everyone get bored, mutter, mutter. To sit here and say sport (not even the whole sport, just one competition external to domestics) without relegation/promotion is dead/boring/non competitive is just fudging ignorant and judgemental (because it's not in your experience doesn't mean it sucks or doesn't work)
- The entire lack of acknowledgement that the game is currently broken, and Spurs fans are cheering at the rafters at keeping in place a system that has fudged us over and over and making sure City/Chelsea use the UK game as their plaything for the next decade.
wow .. that was too long ...