• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Ed Milliband repeats himself

Too Much Debt_0.jpg

That is a flimflam graph. UK public debt is around 70% of GDP
 
The UK's consolidated debt (non-financial, financial, government and household) to GDP is actually closer to 1000%

It's why we're big fans of rehypothecation

We are in so much brick, it's unreal
 
Last edited:

that seems to suggest that our household debt is on a par with most other major economies and our main problem is the debt within the financial sector with dwarfs that of anyone else (appx 600% of GDP per their graph) - which is why we are a) sensible in trying to reduce personal debt and be less reliant on the financial sector and b) move our economy away from reliance on financial services
 
The graph includes all the contingent liabilities, including public-sector backed guarantees, and most importantly, the Net Present Value of healthcare and pensions

Well, RBS just paid back their government backed loans. And how can anyone who what or healthcare and pension liabilities are?

It demonstrates that we need to address them before they get out of hand. The US debt s almost entirely down to bush with his massive tax cut or those earning more than $250,000 a year and the two wars.
 
You could say your bank has a full liability for the whole value of your mortgage. In fact your house is also an asset and th bank can repossess it.

The financial liabilities are just that, we are the lender of last resort for our banks as w still hav a central bank, eurozone countries don't.

We have a growing population and tax base, something Feance, Italy and Germany don't have. In the long term we will be fine as long as we control the debt now and keep o borrowing costs down.

Hollande will find out just how powerful the markets are now when you think you can ask them to finance your welfare state and then think you can dictate terms.
 
Well, RBS just paid back their government backed loans. And how can anyone who what or healthcare and pension liabilities are?

It demonstrates that we need to address them before they get out of hand. The US debt s almost entirely down to bush with his massive tax cut or those earning more than $250,000 a year and the two wars.
Anyway, I can't wait to see how Hollande gets on in charge of France

One of the laziest, self-serving, ignorant countries in the world, now has a socialist in charge:ross:

Bye bye Euro!
 
Anyway, I can't wait to see how Hollande gets on in charge of France

One of the laziest, self-serving, ignorant countries in the world, now has a socialist in charge:ross:

Bye bye Euro!

We will get dragged into a massive recession us that happens. Resist all further integration by all means. fudge the ECHR off yes. But the eurozone crashing would fudge the global economy including us.
 
ÔÇÿThe British have been particularly shy about the issues of financial regulation, and attentive only to the interests of the City ÔÇô hence their reluctance to see the introduction of a tax on financial transactions and tax harmonisation in Europe.ÔÇÖ

We aren't reluctant to see an introduction of financial transaction taxes and tax harminisation... We flatly oppose it you gimp. The same way we oppose your failed currency and most of us oppose your European vanity project full stop.
 
That graph presents a flawed argument.

Debt here is always going to be higher for 2 reasons:

1 - We have a massive financial services sector which obviously carries large amount of debt due to the amount of transactions that are going through it

2 - It includes mortgages which we in the UK have a lot of, in Germany for instance hardly anyone buys there with the majority renting property. This is mainly because house prices and wages have remained flattish for years so there is no incentive to buy but thats for another thread.
 
Back