That may be. It kind of brings me back to my point earlier though.
Most people on this forum voted that AVB needed at least a season once he had his team in place to be judged. I don't know if this is the squad he wanted or just what was available, but let's assume it is his finalised squad. Barring any "serious relegation fears" we're at least 6 months too early (far more than that IMO) from the point at which we can make an accurate assessment of what's happening.
Whilst it looks terrible right now, what if we're that one signing AVB wanted from it all clicking? Remember what we used to look like when Modric was injured? Fvcking awful. Put that player back into the team and we looked like world beaters. I'm not saying it's the case (in fact it's quite unlikely) but what if we're just a January transfer window away from the system working for the next few decades?
Let me go one further.
As I keep on saying (curiously to no reply from the dawn chorus) AVB has actually NOT been given his first choices in any window at the club thus far.
He wanted Moutinho, he did not get him.
He wanted Villa, he did not get him.
He wanted Oscar, he did not get him.
He wanted Contrao, he did not get him.
He wanted Willian, got closer here than any other but ultimately did not get him.
He did not want to lose Modric but had to face the facts.
He thought he had Bale for one more season, he lost him around Hong Kong.
Again, the geezer has not complained, but that's besides the point.
All this 'he spent 100 million'…we have a Director of Football situation in place, which ALL OF US were excited by as I remember. There will have been a list of players/types of player wanted. Baldini will have come back with players he could get that he felt suited the manager's remit. There will, for example, always be a question mark as to whether Lamela was a Baldini or AVB buy? If you consider that the club has gone for the DOF structure so as there will be continuity with the playing staff, you'd guess that perhaps Baldini was the one who suggested him and AVB went along with it.
No-one is saying AVB shouldn't be able to do better, and that if this is the best he can do, then it spells trouble…but there is a genuine concern for me that people are confusing 100 million spent with 'AVB's choice' and that perhaps, just perhaps, he is in the middle of something which requires more work than Fifa14 'champions' can fathom (although that much has to be obvious right now)…I will say right now I suspect he'd have been happier with a 50 million budget and Bale (for example) than 100 million…
I'll be interested to see who can read this in it's entire context and not just the context they want to see...