glasgowspur
Luka Modric
I did say all drugs, then I assumed you were talking about Heroin in your previous post, so I responded talking about heroin.
I don't disagree with you that people in the grip of heroin addiction are not right thinking people. But how does making drugs illegal help them in any way at all? How does it help anybody? The drugs being illegal does nothing to stop them taking it. Having to pay for the drugs means, if they are poor, they have to commit crime to fund their drug habit.
You say that administering a program of freely available heroin would not be able to be done without great expense. I agree, it would likely cost money. But how much does it cost to police the illegal drug trade at every level? The court cases, the prisons, all the crimes committed by addicts to get money to feed their habit? It might be that it's more cost effective, with fewer victims of crime and safer product for addicts who are gonna take the sh1t come what may, to give it to them free, legally.
I'd also say that smoking is legally available, yet because of government health campaigns against it, less people smoke now than they did 30 years ago. I know it has become more expensive, but I don't think it's a cost thing, cheap baccy is always available -- I think less people smoke because more people are aware of the damaging effects on health and less people start smoking as a result.
With something like Heroin, the negative effects are widely known already. I do not see a rush of people all going off and doing heroin just because it's there legally. As I've said before, if you really want some heroin, you'll go and get some anyway.
I did say all drugs, then I assumed you were talking about Heroin in your previous post, so I responded talking about heroin.
I don't disagree with you that people in the grip of heroin addiction are not right thinking people. But how does making drugs illegal help them in any way at all? How does it help anybody? The drugs being illegal does nothing to stop them taking it. Having to pay for the drugs means, if they are poor, they have to commit crime to fund their drug habit.
You say that administering a program of freely available heroin would not be able to be done without great expense. I agree, it would likely cost money. But how much does it cost to police the illegal drug trade at every level? The court cases, the prisons, all the crimes committed by addicts to get money to feed their habit? It might be that it's more cost effective, with fewer victims of crime and safer product for addicts who are gonna take the sh1t come what may, to give it to them free, legally.
I'd also say that smoking is legally available, yet because of government health campaigns against it, less people smoke now than they did 30 years ago. I know it has become more expensive, but I don't think it's a cost thing, cheap baccy is always available -- I think less people smoke because more people are aware of the damaging effects on health and less people start smoking as a result.
With something like Heroin, the negative effects are widely known already. I do not see a rush of people all going off and doing heroin just because it's there legally. As I've said before, if you really want some heroin, you'll go and get some anyway.
I agree making it illegal doesn't help anyone, but I don't see that making it legal will help anyone either.
A lot of your reply actually seems to contradict your argument. Crime caused by drug use isn't going to go away because it's legal. There is plenty of crime that stems from alcohol and tobacco and they are both legal. Look at the black market in fake cigarettes, do you really think the drug barons are going to throw their hand in and walk away?
But if it's legal more people are likely to try it and I think that's when we would have big problems.
Also in today's culture of litigation how long would it be before a class action would be brought against the government for the damage done to people who have become addicted and had their lives ruined.
And plenty of people have become addicted to proscribed morphine.