BrainOfLevy
Michael Carrick
It's all pure speculation. My point is that anyone right now trying to say that player public comments and a few pictures is proof that people were wrong with regards to how the Spurs players may have been influenced by Chelsea is seriously misguided.
Unless you know some of the players personally, then no one knows what is going on. That includes the media, although a lot of the journos will be matey with some of the players (and agents, coaches etc) and have a better insight than the average fan. But does it really matter if the Manager isn't liked by the players? Not really. It's no secret that a fair few Utd players over the years don't like Fergie for example. It's how the Manager handles those players that's the key.
I don't disagree, it doesn't actually matter if the players like the manager as long as they are handled well and still perform on the pitch.
All I'm saying is that there were a number of people on here who were saying 'Not AVB, that wouldn't be good, our players wouldn't give him any respect because they will hear from Chelsea players what he is like', and there were also a number of people that said 'Don't think that matters, our players wouldn't care what happened at Chelsea as long as AVB does well for them'. I think it's fair to say that the people that nailed their colours to the AVB mast and had confidence that there wouldn't be some sort of uproar/lack of respect were probably right in their prediction. I think you can see that from the generally positive attitude coming from the players, the tweets from players both young and senior, and how they all seem to be enjoying themselves. Credit should go where credit is due to the people that were confident AVB's time at Chelsea wouldn't really mean he wouldn't work here.
I also don't disagree that the real test of management will be when we have a loss, or some bad form. But that's changing the goalposts, and that's something that would be the case under any manager, whether or not he didn't get on with Chelsea players. But the original argument, way back when people were saying they would want AVB in for Harry, was that some people thought he would be a bad appointment because 'players talk', and that the Chelsea players will let ours know 'what he is really like'. That clearly hasn't happened. They've had all summer to talk, but they are giving AVB a chance.
The argument when he was first linked was not that 'they would always give him a chance because they had no choice', it was that he would be a bad choice as manager because of Chelsea. If he then turns into an arrogant tosser and loses the respect of the players during a bad run of form, then that's because he's turned into a tosser during a bad run of form, not because the Chelsea players told our players to give him no respect. It will be because of poor management that he has performed on our players, and that would be the case for any manager that we hire. Ergo - the fact the Chelsea players may have told bad things to our players actually makes no difference to his success or failure at all, just like the people who were backing AVB in the first place said it wouldn't.
Not that AVB will turn into an arrogant tosser IMO, I'm also going to predict that if we go through a bad run of form he will handle it well and largely have the respect of the players still.