Lemonade Money
Les Medley
McNulty lol. Clickbait for divs. Nothing will change, too many idiots who lap up the clickbait media and twitter.
Me? To the bloody end of it.How far through next season would you let this form continue, in the belief it will turn around?
Me? To the bloody end of it.
I'm sure we all remember the absolute "kaning" we gave Liverpool early in Klopp's reign at Wembley, yesterday was nowhere near as bad as that.
Let's just hold our powder and see what ange can do.
Yes, it's role reversal, that is my point.we were one of the best sides in Europe then, we did the same to Madrid and Dortmund
Think you need to rewatch that game. We deservedly beat them but we were nowhere near as comfortable as The Dippers were for 60 mins yesterday. Had a quick look at the stats from that game which bear that out.I'm sure we all remember the absolute "kaning" we gave Liverpool early in Klopp's reign at Wembley, yesterday was nowhere near as bad as that.
Let's just hold our powder and see what ange can do.
Think you need to rewatch that game. We deservedly beat them but we were nowhere near as comfortable as The Dippers were for 60 mins yesterday. Had a quick look at the stats from that game which bear that out.
Wasn’t it Lovren? And Kane absolutely murdering Lovren was a big part of the reason we won that game.Really, klopp had to remove one of his CBs, big baldy geezer, can't remember his name, because he was getting humiliated.
Yes, lovern! Could not remember his name.Wasn’t it Lovren? And Kane absolutely murdering Lovren was a big part of the reason we won that game.
Yesterday, from minute 10 to 60, The Dippers absolutely bummed us.
I’m not seeing overwhelming negativity; I am seeing (and feeling) understandable concerns.Sorry mate, that's truly pathetic. Give it a fudging chance. I've just about had it with this board...all you negative arseholes are bringing me down too much.
The adaptions to what you have I just don’t getI’m not seeing overwhelming negativity; I am seeing (and feeling) understandable concerns.
We are in reverse at this stage; the longer Ange has had with the team the worse the results have been (we are on our worst run in 20 years), and the less the players seem to understand his system. We have been poor to watch for months, save for the occasional short spell in games.
Many are saying he needs the right players to succeed. That may be true, but I am not sure that our board will facilitate the huge clear out/influx of new players over the summer that he clearly feels we need; and I can’t imagine that he is ever going to be backed like the managers of City, Liverpool or Arsenal have been.
My worries are that he has failed to adapt in any way to the players who are actually at his disposal right now; that he seems idealistic, somewhat naive, and quite stubborn; and that he has failed to address some very obvious errors which are causing us issues in almost every game.
He has said from the off that he should be judged on his second season. However, if we do succeed in bringing in a sizeable number of new players then surely the cry will then be that they need a season to adapt to his system (why would they be any different to the players who needed time to adapt this year)? And if results don’t start well from August then I fear he won’t get very long…
For what it’s worth, I feel that he should be given all of next season as a minimum (provided, obviously, that we are not in the bottom six). But I do think he is going to have to become much cannier tactically, and he will need to accept that his system will need compromise if it is to bring any level of success.
I’m not seeing overwhelming negativity; I am seeing (and feeling) understandable concerns.
We are in reverse at this stage; the longer Ange has had with the team the worse the results have been (we are on our worst run in 20 years), and the less the players seem to understand his system. We have been poor to watch for months, save for the occasional short spell in games.
Many are saying he needs the right players to succeed. That may be true, but I am not sure that our board will facilitate the huge clear out/influx of new players over the summer that he clearly feels we need; and I can’t imagine that he is ever going to be backed like the managers of City, Liverpool or Arsenal have been.
My worries are that he has failed to adapt in any way to the players who are actually at his disposal right now; that he seems idealistic, somewhat naive, and quite stubborn; and that he has failed to address some very obvious errors which are causing us issues in almost every game.
He has said from the off that he should be judged on his second season. However, if we do succeed in bringing in a sizeable number of new players then surely the cry will then be that they need a season to adapt to his system (why would they be any different to the players who needed time to adapt this year)? And if results don’t start well from August then I fear he won’t get very long…
For what it’s worth, I feel that he should be given all of next season as a minimum (provided, obviously, that we are not in the bottom six). But I do think he is going to have to become much cannier tactically, and he will need to accept that his system will need compromise if it is to bring any level of success.
We play the whole of next season like this we’ll get relegated.
It's always been about the second season with Ange. Not sure why folks are getting twitchy now. Ange is not the problem here.