I would say it's because the bulk of fans, especially the younger variety have been conditioned to believe that to improve your club's situation your first port of call is to shed the manager. The hiring and firing motif is pretty much the poster child of the Premier league era.
What we absolutely must do is listen to the footballing experts within the club. If paratici and lange and to a lesser extent Munn are seeing in Ange the right characteristics for the club to progress then Ange should be backed fully. If in actual fact he is showing signs of being "found out" or any fundamental problems in the way he's going about his job (I firmly believe this isn't the case) then he needs time.
I'm definitely glass half full, always have been about our managers and would even have backed the likes of Sherwood if he was a positive for the club. That being said I expect the senior football management (not Levy) to be objective and not lead us further down a path that is not going to have a positive outcome.
Ange plays high risk football now at a club which has a brittle confidence collectively, a culture he is trying to change window by window. As we are signing young players the system relies on some of the older heads stepping up and the performances of the likes of Son, Maddison and Bissouma, who I would say are the expected leaders in the dressing room, have left us without effective leadership on the pitch of late.
We need to rid ourselves of the brittle "sexy" tag and I'm certain Ange knows the type of player he needs to achieve this.
