• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Welcome Ange: To Dare is to Didgeridoo

DeanoAustin said:
I think, in fairness to Neville, he’s talking about the ownership model and it’s always seemed, for better or worse, that Levy is the man and he has a firm grasp of what’s going on and is invested in it. Our infrastructure is also light years ahead of Man U in terms of facilities. At United, it’s a brickshow because the owners don’t give much of a fudge. That’s the narrative he’s pushing.

He’s still wrong because while Levy has been a constant, his strategy on the football side has changed many times including this summer.

Neville’s become blinded by his dislike of the Glazers because every single United discussion with him comes back to that topic which is masking the failures of others.
Click to expand...

Yet there is absolutely no doubt whatsoever that for all his mistakes Levy had Spurs in far far better shape than United have been under the Glaziers. United, with their revenue should have been walking the league a la City for the past decade. The Glaziers have done more for free competition than the FA. A shame City have been allowed to hack their way to taking uniteds place - essentially by paying the highest salaries.

Levy has allowed us to punch above our weight and at least have a shot at the richest clubs.
 
Last edited:
DeanoAustin said:
He has but how often have you heard all sorts of people, fans and media alike, saying players need a disciplinarian? It was said a lot about United under OGS. It sounds like Sancho has been unprofessional to me. Ronaldo was extremely self centred and displayed it many times. Rashford was dropped for being late to a team meeting (and accepted it to be fair to the lad). So ETH has done what a lot of fans would be pleading for.

Ferguson did what ETH did routinely. I guess there are some crucial differences. Fergie rarely made it public. ETH has given too much information IMO. The world has also moved on from the days where you could “tell them like it is”. Most crucially, Fergie got rid of lads who crossed him and had the authority to do that. I’m not sure (m)any managers have that option these days when you’re talking about assets worth 100m+.

Just shows what a virtually impossible job football management is these days.
Click to expand...
Ferguson didn’t do it until he was successful
ETH is doing from a point of weakness
Differing hands being played
 
Bedfordspurs said:
Ferguson didn’t do it until he was successful
ETH is doing from a point of weakness
Differing hands being played
Click to expand...

Not sure Paul McGrath or Norman Whiteside would agree. Jim Leighton also got publicly humiliated for the cup final and never spoke to Ferguson afterwards. Ferguson was ruthless early-on which enabled him to gain the control he craved and that, in turn, allowed him to forge the club in his image.

However, he was dealing with lads worth hundreds of thousands. ETH is dealing with lads worth nearly 100m each.
 
DeanoAustin said:
Not sure Paul McGrath or Norman Whiteside would agree. Jim Leighton also got publicly humiliated for the cup final and never spoke to Ferguson afterwards. Ferguson was ruthless early-on which enabled him to gain the control he craved and that, in turn, allowed him to forge the club in his image.

However, he was dealing with lads worth hundreds of thousands. ETH is dealing with lads worth nearly 100m each.
Click to expand...
And Fergie just had to deal with a handful of reporters and their print newspapers who could only cover a finite amount of information. Now every word is scrutinised by millions on The Internet.
 
DeanoAustin said:
Not sure Paul McGrath or Norman Whiteside would agree. Jim Leighton also got publicly humiliated for the cup final and never spoke to Ferguson afterwards. Ferguson was ruthless early-on which enabled him to gain the control he craved and that, in turn, allowed him to forge the club in his image.

However, he was dealing with lads worth hundreds of thousands. ETH is dealing with lads worth nearly 100m each.
Click to expand...

none of the United players are worth nearly £100m
They have over paid constantly now for ages
 
DeanoAustin said:
Not sure Paul McGrath or Norman Whiteside would agree. Jim Leighton also got publicly humiliated for the cup final and never spoke to Ferguson afterwards. Ferguson was ruthless early-on which enabled him to gain the control he craved and that, in turn, allowed him to forge the club in his image.

However, he was dealing with lads worth hundreds of thousands. ETH is dealing with lads worth nearly 100m each.
Click to expand...

Back then players around a few million are the same as 100 mil players now. I remember thr good old days where you will see the back page of a rag with a transfer story or if no where ... I used to try to read other people's news papers sitting on the train ... yep I was one of those tossers
 
Bedfordspurs said:
none of the United players are worth nearly £100m
They have over paid constantly now for ages
Click to expand...

You're absolutely right they aren't but that's what they've paid. And on their balance sheet, Onana is ~50m, Sancho is ~50m and Antony is ~60m. That's just 3 examples. The "assets" he's falling out with are valuable (I know he hasn't fallen out with all of these 3, they're just examples). In those terms, Ten Hag, himself, is worth very little.
 
Bishop said:
I think the answer has to be no. It's not worth the risk in terms of time and opportunity cost to bring in a player like Dele who is not playing to any degree of form and hasn't now for many years. It makes a lot more sense to find a younger and in form player who can provide what Dele brought at the time.

Yes he was good for us but many years. As Tottenham fans we need to let go of this small club mentality where hark back to bygone times with ex players and coaches.

The only way is forward and forward doesn't not involve hiring previously failed components.

Sent from my XQ-BC72 using Fapatalk
Click to expand...

I wouldn't say that the size of the club has any link to whether we hire ex players or not. I also think to call Dele's career at Spurs a failure is wide of the mark. His decline has been explained and the lack of support the club gave him at the time (they may not have known but should have made it their job to know).

In a more general sense, if we get the opportunity to resign a player who was a success, and they are still able to contribute, we should not take a view that it's simply not something "big" clubs do - Barca would take Messi back in a blink of an eye, and they are one of the biggest clubs....
 
DeanoAustin said:
You're absolutely right they aren't but that's what they've paid. And on their balance sheet, Onana is ~50m, Sancho is ~50m and Antony is ~60m. That's just 3 examples. The "assets" he's falling out with are valuable (I know he hasn't fallen out with all of these 3, they're just examples). In those terms, Ten Hag, himself, is worth very little.
Click to expand...
That’s because the club are a mess and with his guidance they brought the wrong players and over paid massively
 
DeanoAustin said:
You're absolutely right they aren't but that's what they've paid. And on their balance sheet, Onana is ~50m, Sancho is ~50m and Antony is ~60m. That's just 3 examples. The "assets" he's falling out with are valuable (I know he hasn't fallen out with all of these 3, they're just examples). In those terms, Ten Hag, himself, is worth very little.
Click to expand...
The likes of Antony and Onana are 100% on Ten Haag though, players he’s previously worked with and would have requested.
 
Surfless said:
I wouldn't say that the size of the club has any link to whether we hire ex players or not. I also think to call Dele's career at Spurs a failure is wide of the mark. His decline has been explained and the lack of support the club gave him at the time (they may not have known but should have made it their job to know).

In a more general sense, if we get the opportunity to resign a player who was a success, and they are still able to contribute, we should not take a view that it's simply not something "big" clubs do - Barca would take Messi back in a blink of an eye, and they are one of the biggest clubs....
Click to expand...

You misunderstand me. I'm not calling Dele's Tottenham career a failure but the last 3 years were poor, very poor. His next 2 years have been a failure. To bring him back now based on the form of 7 years ago would not be a wise course of action. There's nothing to suggest he would perform like he did in 2015.

No big club, no serious club is going back in for a player whose career has totally tailed off purely for some misplaced sentimental reasons.

Sent from my XQ-BC72 using Fapatalk
 
Last edited:
Bishop said:
You misunderstand me. I'm not calling Dele's Tottenham career a failure but the last 3 years were poor, very poor. His next 2 years have been a failure. To bring him back now based on the form of 7 years ago would not be a wise course of action. There's nothing to suggest he would perform like he did in 2015.

No big club, no serious club is going back in for a player whose career has totally tailed purely for some misplaced sentimental reasons.

Sent from my XQ-BC72 using Fapatalk
Click to expand...

It's astounding how bad him and ndombele have become. All that skill just being wasted.
 

Interesting comment about if he would want a billion to spend, summary, its getting the right chemistry and players pulling in right direction vs. best players in their position.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back