1) it is true.
2) yes, it will.
3) I'm willing to give Munn the benefit of the doubt, he's only been here about a year.
Gray is u21. His amortisation won't count towards psr. He's not registered in the first team squad. He's on the b list.
1) it is true.
2) yes, it will.
3) I'm willing to give Munn the benefit of the doubt, he's only been here about a year.
There is no exclusion for u21 players, and it doesn't matter whether a player is registered on which list, the exclusion is that you can exclude "youth development costs" from the PSR calculation. £50m worth of transfer and agent fees to take on an 18 year old developed by another club and then plonk him straight into your first team match day squads - I mean you *could* attempt to justify that as a "youth development" cost in your PSR submission, but, the PL are unlikely to see that as a youth development cost and even if they accepted it was, all transactions are subject to a "fair market value" test - nobody spends that money on a player being signed for the academy.Gray is u21. His amortisation won't count towards psr. He's not registered in the first team squad. He's on the b list.
Went back to look at the goals again. Son isn't involved in any of ours (apart from missing a pen), and is nowhere to be seen defending for any of the goals conceded (apart from standing off Trent and allowing him to cross for their first). You don't think playing with 10 men is a reason to lose games?Son isn't the reason we concede 2 goals at home to Wolves, 6 goals at home to Liverpool. Least of Ange's problems
There is no exclusion for u21 players, and it doesn't matter whether a player is registered on which list, the exclusion is that you can exclude "youth development costs" from the PSR calculation. £50m worth of transfer and agent fees to take on an 18 year old developed by another club and then plonk him straight into your first team match day squads - I mean you *could* attempt to justify that as a "youth development" cost in your PSR submission, but, the PL are unlikely to see that as a youth development cost and even if they accepted it was, all transactions are subject to a "fair market value" test - nobody spends that money on a player being signed for the academy.
I think we have been naive and nothing else
Cost cutting maybe but that is just to have money to spend in subsequent windows
We don’t want the baggage anymore of having so many unwanted players around and that’s healthy
But we have left ourselves 3/4 short for this season
Fully agreeIt's just part of the process of going through a rebuild - you have to knock things down to start again and is one of the reasons why i don't think we've ever really shown ourselves to have committed to doing so until now. We had a bloated squad that we needed to cull a lot of, which hampered us previously in terms of having to move players on before bringing new ones in - we're now actually in a good space going in to the upcoming windows, we have a low starting wage budget & space in the squad so plenty of wiggle room.
Problem is I hope and pray that we don’t make the same mistakes over and over again.It's just part of the process of going through a rebuild - you have to knock things down to start again and is one of the reasons why i don't think we've ever really shown ourselves to have committed to doing so until now. We had a bloated squad that we needed to cull a lot of, which hampered us previously in terms of having to move players on before bringing new ones in - we're now actually in a good space going in to the upcoming windows, we have a low starting wage budget & space in the squad so plenty of wiggle room.
Son tries to defendWent back to look at the goals again. Son isn't involved in any of ours (apart from missing a pen), and is nowhere to be seen defending for any of the goals conceded (apart from standing off Trent and allowing him to cross for their first). You don't think playing with 10 men is a reason to lose games?
It's just part of the process of going through a rebuild - you have to knock things down to start again and is one of the reasons why i don't think we've ever really shown ourselves to have committed to doing so until now. We had a bloated squad that we needed to cull a lot of, which hampered us previously in terms of having to move players on before bringing new ones in - we're now actually in a good space going in to the upcoming windows, we have a low starting wage budget & space in the squad so plenty of wiggle room.
Son tries to defend
He also tries to attack
His efforts there
But he can’t keep up with the pace
That's different. The fact that youth development costs do not count towards PSR mean that when you sell an academy player the entire transfer fee is recorded as profit. That does not mean paying out a huge sum to sign a player that happens to be 18 is excluded from the PSR calculation. Gray wouldn't be classed as "club trained" for example and if he happened to be available on a free transfer Spurs wouldn't be entitled to compensation due to developing him. I.e. he is not an academy player (although he will eventually be classed as a club trained player if he stays until he is 21)Could? It's always been the case. Chelsea used the trick for years buying youngsters then selling them to get around the rules.
1) it is true.
2) yes, it will.
3) I'm willing to give Munn the benefit of the doubt, he's only been here about a year.
That's different. The fact that youth development costs do not count towards PSR mean that when you sell an academy player the entire transfer fee is recorded as profit. That does not mean paying out a huge sum to sign a player that happens to be 18 is excluded from the PSR calculation. Gray wouldn't be classed as "club trained" for example and if he happened to be available on a free transfer Spurs wouldn't be entitled to compensation due to developing him. I.e. he is not an academy player (although he will eventually be classed as a club trained player if he stays until he is 21)
Chelsea buying the likes of de bruyne etc... then selling them. Was different how?
Gray will be classed as club trained.
Did you ever hear KDB's story about his infamous meeting with Jose?
Jose completely tried to gas-light KDB and put some lies, damn lies and statistics about his player in front of him. For a young guy, KDB read Jose like a book. He knew the stats were only the way they were because Jose wasn't giving him a fair chance. He knew he wasn't getting a fair chance because he wouldn't be subservient to his manager, a total requirement of the narcissist from his players.
So rather than get into a fight with Jose (narcissists love that), he calmly closed the meeting, called his agent and said he was leaving the club.
He just used the narcissist as complete motivation to have a phenomenal career after Chelsea.
And which genius of a manager is going to get us to where a lot of (deluded) fans expect us to be ie top 5/6 and competing for honours in all the cups whilst we are at it? Even Poch struggled to balance when we was in the Europa League and the league hence why he often played such weakened teams and the number of teams competing for Europe in our league is far greater now than back then.Yes - and they didn’t replace some of them, just like they muddled through for a year without replacing our star striker.
My point is that they will never spend the money necessary to have a minimum of 2 x quality players for every, position a la City. Without that this system won’t work, in my opinion (and I have my doubts that it will work in the PL even if they did).
I doubt we’ll agree though.
Chelsea bought De Bruyne before PSR was even a thing.Chelsea buying the likes of de bruyne etc... then selling them. Was different how?
Gray will be classed as club trained.
Chelsea bought De Bruyne before PSR was even a thing.
Gray will be classed as club trained if he stays here for 3 years. Before he's spent 3 years at THFC before his 21st birthday he's not classed as club trained.
And which genius of a manager is going to get us to where a lot of (deluded) fans expect us to be ie top 5/6 and competing for honours in all the cups whilst we are at it? Even Poch struggled to balance when we was in the Europa League and the league hence why he often played such weakened teams and the number of teams competing for Europe in our league is far greater now than back then.
Fact is our squad is nowhere near deep enough quality wise, and either fans have to accept expectations shouldn't be as high as they are based on one manager in the past twenty plus years making at least a go of it, or if they do think that goal is achievable then should be looking at the fact it's not the manager that is holding us back. There's only so many times you can change manager and get the same end result before it becomes apparent they aren't the overriding issue....
Respectfully disagree. Even without going through our squad which is imbalanced and thin on the 'quality players right now' segment - there are now too many good teams not playing in Europe each season who can beat those who are playing in Europe - this year Forest, Fulham, Brighton, Saudi Sportswashing Machine, Bournemouth are the clubs who can. We need to have a better/deeper squad than we do currently to match them whilst playing midweek aswell.The squad is plenty deep to finish top 6 & balance playing in the cups.