johnola
Jermaine Jenas
Oh so now you put the club captain, the scorer of 17 goals, on the bench.Son is not a natural centre forward I agree. But we need a squad so I would keep Son
Sounds worse than moving him on to me.
Oh so now you put the club captain, the scorer of 17 goals, on the bench.Son is not a natural centre forward I agree. But we need a squad so I would keep Son
Some of them were given time I think but the list is a real mishmash it’s hard to tellUnited under Ole and ETH, Kompany at Burnley, McCarthy at Wolves, Steve Bruce everywhere, Kevin Keegan everywhere, McLaren, Strachan, Robson, Evans, Souness, Megson, Rodgers, Hughes, Trevor Francis, John Gregory.
Some of them were given time I think but the list is a real mishmash it’s hard to tell
Looks like a random list if I’m honest
So I’ll go back to the question.., what top side hasnt given a manager time and still been successful
Chelsea under Roman would be the one
The phrase we ‘inevitably concede’ suggests that we are in the land of Ossie Ardiles as manager. Why should any top team ‘inevitably concede’?and when we inevitably concede we have far too big a job to do to come back.
The phrase we ‘inevitably concede’ suggests that we are in the land of Ossie Ardiles as manager. Why should any top team ‘inevitably concede’?
We’re not a top team
The table says we’re one of the top 5 teams in the PL, arguably the world’s top league.We’re not a top team
The table says we’re one of the top 5 teams in the PL, arguably the world’s top league.
And perhaps I should have posted why should ANY team ‘inevitably concede’? The fact that we are all beginning games assuming we will let goals in is a huge worry, especially since our central defenders are the strongest area of our team.
It's the goal.
I have no idea what this means.Yeah, duh. I’m saying that best way to stop conceding is to score more ourselves.
I have no idea what this means.
Where is that from?The phrase we ‘inevitably concede’ suggests that we are in the land of Ossie Ardiles as manager. Why should any top team ‘inevitably concede’?
I’m not sure it does if you stick rigidly to a porous system which allows other teams almost endless chances (see last night’s excellent MOTD2 analysis). Again, we’re back to Ossie’s days in charge; we scored tons of goals, we let in even more.Wow…not sure I can really help you then. Pretty easy to understand that scoring when on top allows you to take control of a match.
I’m not sure it does if you stick rigidly to a porous system which allows other teams almost endless chances (see last night’s excellent MOTD2 analysis). Again, we’re back to Ossie’s days in charge; we scored tons of goals, we let in even more.