To bring some certaintyWhy rush deals through for players we can’t play?
To bring some certaintyWhy rush deals through for players we can’t play?
Certainty of what?To bring some certainty
Quite a different market to actually be buying an asset… which is what a transfer is. It’s not recruitment from a open market for a startYou snooze, you lose - whilst our transfers inch towards completion, some other team wakes up - contacted by the player's agent - and then the player's head is turned. I have been in recruitment for 37 years - if the candidate doesn't take the job pretty quickly then he/she starts to have other choices. Now you want the candidate to end up happy with the new employer - in this case team - but if you leave it for a while they almost always find reasons not to sign up - same psychology in Football - if you want the player, get it done!
Certainty of what?
We can have everything agreed with the club but can’t announce it until the player signs when he can… just like the sancho deal
How quickly should a deal be done before it becomes ‘taking too long’?
Yep....but if the players agent speaks to another club in the meantime, he might not sign and therefore the deal collapses
Sorry to do this to this Forum and all the positives I am reading BUT if Paratici has the Gil deal ready and Romero hot to trot, what's the betting our Chairrman has now stepped up and said well don Fabio - lets leave it for three weeks and see if they blink and we can get a few £m off these deals?
Now you can pile in on me about this negativity but why do our deals seem to take so long? Why are our deals always incredibly complex and thus they often fall through Just give them the parking space/luncheon vouchers Danny - don't sweat the little stuff
Well I said I don't mean to pour cold water on things - but obviously have Disappointed too many times - Moutinho lives on in my mind - could have got us in to the CL a season or two before we made it... So I just struggle to feel optimistic. And if Harry goes then I will be disconsolate - it will be such an indictment of Levy's tenure that the Chairman should then hang his head in shame that our best striker since Greavsie has no confidence in the club winning things. I suppose I could live in hope like many on here - as well as not letting a word be said against the Chairman - but, as they say, its the hope that kills you! And BTW - I would love to be proved wrong and would very quickly give credit to DL but just not holding my breath )Have you always been a miserable sod?
Have you always been a miserable sod?
Course he isIsn't Paratici responsible for negotiating as well? Surely he's been given a budget by Levy, and he's going about doing his job with that. Would he have wanted the job if he wasn't given authority to sign deals? You'd think that was a given with his job, but who knows.
It's only takes a minute giiirrlllOnly takes minutes on FM.
I too will be able to confirm it once it's generally known. ITK.Hercules on SC
More will come out later, then I can confirm it.
I too will be able to confirm it once it's generally known. ITK.
Sorry to do this to this Forum and all the positives I am reading BUT if Paratici has the Gil deal ready and Romero hot to trot, what's the betting our Chairrman has now stepped up and said well don Fabio - lets leave it for three weeks and see if they blink and we can get a few £m off these deals?
Now you can pile in on me about this negativity but why do our deals seem to take so long? Why are our deals always incredibly complex and thus they often fall through Just give them the parking space/luncheon vouchers Danny - don't sweat the little stuff
Zero, it's quite clear the negotiating we are doing is not Levy's style.
Are you seriously asking why a swap deal in Covid times between two clubs in different countries, with one of the players in the Olympics (in a third country) is taking time?
Romero actually didn't belong to Atalanta (option/obligation to buy), so they have to execute the transfer to Atalanta, then the sale on to Spurs