Bullet
Andy Thompson
I remember reading it on either the Guardian or the Mail's websites when they broke the story. I have no reason to doubt it, though: why else would Lyon sell us one of the world's best goalkeepers for a relatively paltry 12 million pound fee?
These clauses are everywhere in football, and I don't think Levy can afford to miss out on a player because he doesn't like them.
It's not like we have to pay Lyon 50 percent of his future fee, after all, just fifty percent of the profit we gain from his resale. We could sell him for 13 million, which means we'd only have to pay Lyon 500,000 quid, if the quoted transfer fee for Lloris is accurate. So it isn't as much of a burden as you seem to think it is.
Nobody mentioned this at the time? Very hard to believe Levy would agree to that, particularly since there is no such thing as a straight 'profit calculation' on a player due to amortisation yadda yadda badaboom badabing