Yeah, not being made a vice-captain considering how long he's been here is a bit of a snub.Either way he has been Maguired. I bet he thought he would have been made captain or vice captain ... I think he's off.
Yeah, not being made a vice-captain considering how long he's been here is a bit of a snub.Either way he has been Maguired. I bet he thought he would have been made captain or vice captain ... I think he's off.
Would you make a guy you're unlikely to play even vice captain? He's at best at the periphery of the squad, making him any sort of captain would just confuse things.Either way he has been Maguired. I bet he thought he would have been made captain or vice captain ... I think he's off.
Would you make a guy you're unlikely to play even vice captain? He's at best at the periphery of the squad, making him any sort of captain would just confuse things.
Sent from my XQ-BC72 using Fapatalk
Surely Levy will given us one last present so we can get over Kane more easily.
Surely Levy will given us one last present so we can get over Kane more easily.
The only benefit would be having a long term fixed and known salary for 8 years. No negotiating a new contract, which often leads to increased salary.So why give him an 8 year contract then?
You are basically saying there is no benefit ffp wise but it does still help them as they pay off the transfer fee over the 8 years?
But why would Brighton agree to that?
Since June 28th. Or might have been July 28th. Anyway, it's in effect.Did the 5 year thing come in to effect (affect?) this season? Thought it may have been from next summer
Ffs no !
Stop! Hammer time mate, there's obviously a player there otherwise some top clubs wouldn't of signed him. Regardless of who here doesn't or does want him, he just doesn't strike me as an Ange ball striker....I would take him, I will get panned for that, but I think in the right situations and teams he gets goals and lots of them. Bring on the ridicule
Stop! Hammer time mate, there's obviously a player there otherwise some top clubs wouldn't of signed him. Regardless of who here doesn't or does want him, he just doesn't strike me as an Ange ball striker....
I agree with you. He's not pretty, but he is effective. Part of getting the wall wide and in is that the CF has to be a nuisance - if he doesn't score he creates space or a mistake for a Kulu, Maddison, Skipp.I would take him, I will get panned for that, but I think in the right situations and teams he gets goals and lots of them. Bring on the ridicule
Been searching around, and not found a single credible source for it.