-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
*** Tottenham vs Swansea OSOMT ***
- Thread starter Jurgen the German
- Start date
Bedfordspurs
Mark Falco
Looks level on VAR
paxtonwolf
Tony Marchi
the one at Wembley was not obvious but got disallowed.
paxtonwolf
Tony Marchi
f@cked over by VAR yet again...
ricky2tricky4city
Steffen Freund
The interplay is fast and slick. Think all the front four are on that wavelength.
Dele does it sometimes but usually dallies and quite often has his own opinion what he's going to do with the ball next.
Kane will interchange (his mid/long range passing is different level this season) but is obviously more interested about banging it in the net, which is fair enough.
Bullet
Andy Thompson
So basically Swansea have got 2 camera angles... one at the half way line and one at the 6 yard line.... so any offside inbetween (i.e. nearly all offsides) are impossible to tell.
And Peter Walton "at VAR HQ" says he thinks it was onside, but it's not his decision as he is not the ex-ref in the VAR hotseat!
And Peter Walton "at VAR HQ" says he thinks it was onside, but it's not his decision as he is not the ex-ref in the VAR hotseat!
PochettinoPochettinoPochettino
Serge Aurier
Clucas is a dirty fcuker.
MKSpur
Christian Ziege
shame as it is, that was so close you couldn't call it so what is the clear and obvious bit...and what happened to the benefit of the doubt for the attacker. secondly does this mean you should carry on and try an score when you are called off, just in case it's subsequently called wrong?
The thing about that goal is that it was ruled out on the pitch, so the 'clear and obvious mistake' bit presumably asks whether it was a mistake to rule it out....in which case its not obvious that it was a mistake so its right for the goal not to stand
Had the linesman not given it offside though but then they checked it, the goal would have stood as it wouldnt have been a clear and obvious error to allow it.
Had the linesman not given it offside though but then they checked it, the goal would have stood as it wouldnt have been a clear and obvious error to allow it.
Seedy Ron
Jimmy Neighbour
Don't think VAR should overrule the linesman there personally, wasn't really clear.
Problem was we've seen it do the opposite.
Disagree. How could VAR say from that that the linesman was clearly wrong? It was a marginal call
Benefit of the doubt for the attacker hasn't been a thing for years.
MKSpur
Christian Ziege
With Son and Moura we have two direct runners, it's going to be great to have at least one of them as a game changing option from the bench.The interplay is fast and slick. Think all the front four are on that wavelength.
Dele does it sometimes but usually dallies and quite often has his own option what he's going to do with the ball next.
Kane will interchange (his mid/long range passing is different level this season) but is obviously more interested about banging it in the net, which is fair enough.
He should have waited until the ball hit the net, not convinced he didn.
