We're playing one game a week, mate.Let's hope they avoid injuries from fatigue...seems like certain players are very overused in the last three games
How/to who? Who is excluded by calling someone man of the match in a mens football game?
Idgaf personally as player of the match/man of the match as a title for an award is interchangeable but i just find the argument that one is more inclusive than the other a bit weak in this instance
Ange to the guy putting the mic under his shirt, “Introduce yourself first mate!”
maddison, udogie...3 Games in?
"And we are Hot-take Tottenham"
he's had a bad 15 mins in three games, think its OTT the top myself, I'm more worried about Son and Kulu
maddison, udogie...
Well that was bloody brilliant. We're going to concede chances when it gets as stretched as it did in the middle period of the match, but it's so nice to see us attacking.
The movement is really good, there's always someone showing for the ball and players rarely hanging on to the ball too long.
Long may it continue
When we look at the strong, even dominant, performances of Bissouma, Sarr, and the overall response by players who were on Spurs last season to Ange's more attacking approach, all you can say is 'what a fcuking indictment of Antonio Conte'. It'll be a desperate club that wants to subject their fans to his brand of drab misery in future.
Don't think it's fair to say his wobble led to the crisis, everyone came out sluggish in the 2nd half. IMO Hojberg was the remedy for that, not sulking about not starting but instead managing to steady the ship, gotta love it.
As for Richy, he looked good in the first half and was involved in build up play and was unlucky in the chance he was crowded out of with a potential handball.
It was an unfortunate stumble followed by him ending a counter but a "weakling" mentally is super harsh, I'd go as far to say that that is a flimflam call. He will keep on trying and that's a massive strength, nobody is expecting 30 goals a season but he still played his part in a solid away win today.
Yeah, but how we got the results was unsustainable. With Ange you expect you'll win. With Conte you were hoping you wouldn't lose and maybe eek out a win.To be fair to Conte, he got us top 4 from a bricky position and had us top 4 when he went (albeit there is some context there). If Ange gets similar positions, he’ll have done very well indeed.
Obviously, we’re infinitely better to watch and I like this team a lot more but Conte wasn’t a failure, results wise, at our club. He did well. Just a shame he was a clam playing boring football to do it,
Yeah, but how we got the results was unsustainable. With Ange you expect you'll win. With Conte you were hoping you wouldn't lose and maybe eek out a win.
And their motto is so different.
Conte: I hate to lose
Ange: I go for the win
Yeah, he is a fudging weakling and it nearly cost us, when he kicked out. That could have easily been a red card. He is a head dropper.
To be fair to Conte, he got us top 4 from a bricky position and had us top 4 when he went (albeit there is some context there). If Ange gets similar positions, he’ll have done very well indeed.
Obviously, we’re infinitely better to watch and I like this team a lot more but Conte wasn’t a failure, results wise, at our club. He did well. Just a shame he was a clam playing boring football to do it,
He’d only do that if Richarlison suddenly becomes left footed and unable to do anything other than stand on his right….Son and Kulu have a LOT more credit in the bank than Richarlison. And they’re not getting tripped up by the ball and picking up needless, silly bookings. It seems you like Richarlison the more he doesn’t score. He could play 100 games for us and not score and you’d call him the GOAT.