• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Tottenham Hotspur v Arsenal OMT

I think if we had gone like for like with them formation wise we would have won that half and scored more goals. we have too many attacking minded players to play two out and out strikers against three CMs. Harry has got to earn his money now because we have as good as if not better players, this is more about tactics.
 
I think his biggest decision will be VDV or Lennon for Kranjcar in all honesty.

Lennon has the pace and threat, our goals both come on the counter.. VDV has the ability to hold possession better, has good work rate too but he'll cut in and allow Walker to attack. Lennon's defensive work is top drawer
 
Arsenal will tire as the game continues too. Arsenal have been chasing every ball and making it hard for us, they have been attacking and then rushing back to defend. I think we will get stronger, as they tire, and then push on to success.
 
Hootnow said:
I would't say 4-4-2 got us 2-0 up, the goals have been Arsenal mistakes and the exceptional talent of individual players. The goals haven't come from some kind of sustained play from the formation.
Click to expand...

Exactly this. We didn't have a period of sustained pressure in the game. We have very limited passing options, and are forced to lump it long, which concedes possession.
 
I think BAE was culpable for both, less obviously for the first. Sagna was technically bale's man, but bae switched off and was caught ball watching when the ball went wide meaning bale had to watch both sagna and rvp. Need to go 5 in midfield
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back