ricky2tricky4city
Steffen Freund
We are such a player now.... we're gonna rule the world.
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - Licence To Stand
- Thread starter Jordinho
- Start date
Bedfordspurs
Chris Waddle
It’s being replaced currently
Danishfurniturelover
the prettiest spice girl
I like seeing this thread at the top of the page, it feels retro.
Lemonade Money
Les Medley
Spurs scores appeal win on housing scheme
By Jim Dunton10 July 2019
F3 Architects’ Goods Yard proposals for Tottenham Hotspur FC
Tottenham Hotspur has won planning permission to redevelop a former goods yard near its new Populous-designed stadium with a mixed-use scheme featuring 316 homes.
The club secured consent from a planning inspector for F3 Architects’ plans after it took Haringey council to appeal for non-determination of the proposals.
The scheme earmarked for land next to the railway line to the north of White Hart Lane includes two towers, portrayed as up to 21 storeys in height, and a mix of lower-rise accommodation as well as community, retail, leisure and employment space.
F3 Architects’ proposals for Tottenham Hotspur FC
It would also retain the site’s existing station master’s house, with the locally listed building proposed for conversion into a community café.
Spurs’ original application was a so-called “hybrid” and left matters of scale and appearance to be determined subsequently.
Courtyard view of F3 Architects’ proposals
F3, which is based in Camden, said it was “delighted” that the scheme had been approved following a public inquiry in May.
“The scheme will kick-start regeneration in north Tottenham, building on THFC’s significant investment in the area, and the legacy generated through creation of the new Tottenham Hotspur stadium,” it said.
Planning inspector Robert Mellor said that although Haringey passed a resolution to refuse the scheme after appeal proceedings were begun, the council and the development team had reached agreement on infrastructure provisions and affordable housing levels before the hearing. Spurs offered a minimum of 35%.
Mellor said the scheme – and particularly its two towers – would result in some “less than substantial” harm to the setting and significance of the neighbouring North Tottenham conservation area, which includes the grade II-listed Grange building
But he concluded that there would also be some benefits to the site’s White Hart Lane frontage.
Source: Google Maps
Aerial view of the Goods Yard site in Tottenham, north London
Mellor said that while the harm from the scheme would contravene some of Haringey’s development plan policies, “greater weight” should be attached to its compliance with the up-to-date National Planning Policy Framework.
“Benefits here outweigh the less than substantial harm to the significance of the heritage assets,” he said.
“The proposal is otherwise in overall accordance with the development plan and the appeal should therefore be allowed and a hybrid planning permission granted subject to conditions.”
https://www.bdonline.co.uk/news/spu...erm=Spurs scores appeal win on housing scheme
By Jim Dunton10 July 2019
- F3 Architects-designed development near new stadium will contain 316 homes
F3 Architects’ Goods Yard proposals for Tottenham Hotspur FC
Tottenham Hotspur has won planning permission to redevelop a former goods yard near its new Populous-designed stadium with a mixed-use scheme featuring 316 homes.
The club secured consent from a planning inspector for F3 Architects’ plans after it took Haringey council to appeal for non-determination of the proposals.
The scheme earmarked for land next to the railway line to the north of White Hart Lane includes two towers, portrayed as up to 21 storeys in height, and a mix of lower-rise accommodation as well as community, retail, leisure and employment space.
F3 Architects’ proposals for Tottenham Hotspur FC
It would also retain the site’s existing station master’s house, with the locally listed building proposed for conversion into a community café.
Spurs’ original application was a so-called “hybrid” and left matters of scale and appearance to be determined subsequently.
Courtyard view of F3 Architects’ proposals
F3, which is based in Camden, said it was “delighted” that the scheme had been approved following a public inquiry in May.
“The scheme will kick-start regeneration in north Tottenham, building on THFC’s significant investment in the area, and the legacy generated through creation of the new Tottenham Hotspur stadium,” it said.
Planning inspector Robert Mellor said that although Haringey passed a resolution to refuse the scheme after appeal proceedings were begun, the council and the development team had reached agreement on infrastructure provisions and affordable housing levels before the hearing. Spurs offered a minimum of 35%.
Mellor said the scheme – and particularly its two towers – would result in some “less than substantial” harm to the setting and significance of the neighbouring North Tottenham conservation area, which includes the grade II-listed Grange building
But he concluded that there would also be some benefits to the site’s White Hart Lane frontage.
Source: Google Maps
Aerial view of the Goods Yard site in Tottenham, north London
Mellor said that while the harm from the scheme would contravene some of Haringey’s development plan policies, “greater weight” should be attached to its compliance with the up-to-date National Planning Policy Framework.
“Benefits here outweigh the less than substantial harm to the significance of the heritage assets,” he said.
“The proposal is otherwise in overall accordance with the development plan and the appeal should therefore be allowed and a hybrid planning permission granted subject to conditions.”
https://www.bdonline.co.uk/news/spu...erm=Spurs scores appeal win on housing scheme
LOL @ the courtyard view.
Why are there no shopping trollies and tyres? Also, why is nobody wearing a stab vest?
Why are there no shopping trollies and tyres? Also, why is nobody wearing a stab vest?
As it’s not Glastonbury?
AjaxDeSuperYids
Drama queen
Capacity of NWHL being increased to 62,200.
Source: me
Source: me
spurspinter1
Pat van den Hauwe
So...There's no noise on the sponsorship for the new Stadium, do we take that as nothing is happening, or that something big is about to drop? You'd think that all concerned would want a name for the place coming in to the season but of course I know very little of these types of negotiations.
As an aside, was mulling over tickets for the friendly against Inter and also ticket exchange for one of the NFL games but somehow it just doesn't seem right for my first trip inside our new home, needs to be a competitive proper football match with the mens team (Is that sexist? Don't get me wrong if I was local I'd 100% be there for the Ladies' first match there) and think it may be a while before getting that opportunity.
As an aside, was mulling over tickets for the friendly against Inter and also ticket exchange for one of the NFL games but somehow it just doesn't seem right for my first trip inside our new home, needs to be a competitive proper football match with the mens team (Is that sexist? Don't get me wrong if I was local I'd 100% be there for the Ladies' first match there) and think it may be a while before getting that opportunity.
milo
Jack L. Jones
The reason we haven't got sleeve sponsors is this is getting tied up with the naming rights. If a deal is done, I would've expected it to be announced before the shirt was released.
Gazza
Frederic Kanoute
Don't be silly its an opportunity for Levy to sell a new shirt again.
milo
Jack L. Jones
The sponsors would want to maximise their exposure. If we had a deal, it would be on the shirt.
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
New 8 year deal with AIA for the kit, so presumably they'll take on the stadium too?
With AiA and Nike secured long term should help with refinancing the loans on the stadium.
If a stadium naming rights deal is being announced between August and October that might make sense as would link in with exposure in the run up to the two NFL games that take place early October.
If a stadium naming rights deal is being announced between August and October that might make sense as would link in with exposure in the run up to the two NFL games that take place early October.
milo
Jack L. Jones
I think that it would've been announced at the same time, if that was the case.
Finney Is Back
Andy Thompson
Indeed. Would seem strange to announce a new shirt sponsorship deal only if an agreement had been reached for both.
Looking at the finances involved here though the new deal seems to be double the last one (£20 million a year for 5 years previously I think).
If our shirt sponsorship is now worth £40 million a year I would've thought it is feasible to get 15 to 20 million for a stadium sponsorship deal. I would've thought that a £5 million a year sleeve sponsorship deal is also easily achievable based on the £40 million shirt sponsorship figure (unless AIA have paid us £40 million on the proviso that we don't have a sleeve sponsor? I think the biggest sleeve sponsorship deal is Arsenal's £10 million a year one with Rwanda, but I think there has to be a 100% controversy mark up on that one.
Grays_1890
Barry Daines
I would say that the Stadium deal would be huge, biggest in UK
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
Probably. Although this is the big deal (£40m a year). The stadium (max £20m a year) could be a later smaller announcement to spread out the PR.