Re: Tim Sherwood - Head Coach
I find all the talk of systems quite interesting. I think the logic behind the idea articulated (and bolded) in your post is perfectly sound in theory, but I'm interested in exactly what is meant by a 'system' in practice?
My initial reaction is to say that surely every manager / team has a system - for example, under Sherwood our system has changed to one in which we get more players into the box and play riskier, quicker, more direct passes.
But my second reaction is to ask if the defining feature of having a system is that the manager has more direct control (at a micro level) over what players do when they're on the pitch? So rather than leaving them to do whatever comes naturally to them when they're on the pitch, they're more drilled in certain kinds of patterns of movement and passing, for example?
That's a common mistake that a lot of fans make. That football is all about buying the best players.
Well, the unfortunate news is that if that's what it's all about, you'd better get used to 5th place (barring occasional **** ups from the top 4). Sporting Director or not, we will never beat the bigger spenders over the long term that way. We may discover the odd Modric/Bale/Berbatov but they will always have half a team of those players.
In order to regularly compete with them, our team will have to continually play as more than the sum of its parts. A good motivator (which the current incumbent of our hot seat may well be) can get us playing to the extent of our players' abilities, but we need them to do much more if we're to compete. Without a system that runs through the club from top to bottom, and without that system being better than that of our opponents, we can't get where we all want to be.
As much as I hate to say it, our nomadic neighbours are the perfect example of what we need to do. Can you honestly say you can see Sherwood being the architect and implementer of such a system like Wenger? I just don't see it.
So like I said, I'm doing everything I can to ignore the long term because Levy 's clearly not doing anything about it, so I might as well just enjoy each match as an individual entity.
I find all the talk of systems quite interesting. I think the logic behind the idea articulated (and bolded) in your post is perfectly sound in theory, but I'm interested in exactly what is meant by a 'system' in practice?
My initial reaction is to say that surely every manager / team has a system - for example, under Sherwood our system has changed to one in which we get more players into the box and play riskier, quicker, more direct passes.
But my second reaction is to ask if the defining feature of having a system is that the manager has more direct control (at a micro level) over what players do when they're on the pitch? So rather than leaving them to do whatever comes naturally to them when they're on the pitch, they're more drilled in certain kinds of patterns of movement and passing, for example?