• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Tim Sherwood…gone \o/

Do you want Tim Sherwood to stay as manager?


  • Total voters
    125
  • Poll closed .
Re: Tim Sherwood - Head Coach

1- unless you have inside knowledge of match preparation/training from AVBs time you can't make a call on whether Eriksen should have started more than he did

2- is/was Eriksens position for Ajax not central midfield? (it was) and was this not where he was played for us by AVB? (yes it was)

so no, AVB did not play Eriksen in the wrong position, like you suggested.
 
Re: Tim Sherwood - Head Coach

1- unless you have inside knowledge of match preparation/training from AVBs time you can't make a call on whether Eriksen should have started more than he did

2- is/was Eriksens position for Ajax not central midfield? (it was) and was this not where he was played for us by AVB? (yes it was)

so no, AVB did not play Eriksen in the wrong position, like you suggested.

1) The alternative for that position was Lewis Holtby (and Lamela but with AVB's agenda that was never a realistic option). We've seen Holtby in that role....he's not at all suited to it. He goes wondering during games and looks for the ball which basically means we have no number 10. When that's the alternative i think it's fair to say Eriksen should have started more games.

2) Didn't Eriksen play in the centre of a 4-3-3 at Ajax? that's totally different then playing in the number 10 role of a 4-4-1-1.


I wouldn't say the number 10 is a "wrong position" for Eriksen though but it's definitely a weaker position when comparing it to his left sided role.
 
Re: Tim Sherwood - Head Coach

But that's exactly the thing Raz - they don't have to back Sherwood with signings and money!


I think any manager, even LVG, would sign up with recognition that (for the next 4 years at least), there will have to be zero net spend on transfers.
 
Re: Tim Sherwood - Head Coach

1) The alternative for that position was Lewis Holtby (and Lamela but with AVB's agenda that was never a realistic option). We've seen Holtby in that role....he's not at all suited to it. He goes wondering during games and looks for the ball which basically means we have no number 10. When that's the alternative i think it's fair to say Eriksen should have started more games.

2) Didn't Eriksen play in the centre of a 4-3-3 at Ajax? that's totally different then playing in the number 10 role of a 4-4-1-1.


I wouldn't say the number 10 is a "wrong position" for Eriksen though but it's definitely a weaker position when comparing it to his left sided role.

from what i read he played centrally as part of a middle 3 in his early career then moved more advanced later on - (both centrally and out wide) either way you're both splitting hairs. no doubting he's played better under Sherwood though. i was just thinking i must have missed a few games with him played right wing/up front or something
 
Re: Tim Sherwood - Head Coach

1- unless you have inside knowledge of match preparation/training from AVBs time you can't make a call on whether Eriksen should have started more than he did

2- is/was Eriksens position for Ajax not central midfield? (it was) and was this not where he was played for us by AVB? (yes it was)

so no, AVB did not play Eriksen in the wrong position, like you suggested.


1. We don't need inside knowledge, because the base point is that Eriksen was fit to play but was not on the pitch. If that is because of something that was happening on the training pitch, it's more likely down to the coach/system, not the player.

I will of course concede that he had a settling in period and that may have been some of it. But starting 55% of the time under your new manager is hardly going to inspire confidence.



2. Actually, I believe Eriksen played on the (narrow) left for Ajax at least as much as in the middle, and I suspect that a lot of his work that's called "in the middle" was actually from a starting position on the left.

But anyway, what do you mean by "wrong position"? I define it as a position where he's not at his best, not a theoretical notion that "he's a No. 10 and should be at No. 10". Right here, right now, at this point in his career, starting left and swapping inside is for me his "best position" and all the evidence we have from almost a full season bears that out.

If you'd put Thierry Henry at CF in his first month at Arsenal that would have been his "wrong positon", because he was a winger. But as it turns out, it wasn't the "wrong position" at all.
 
Re: Tim Sherwood - Head Coach

after his initial couple of games where he played well his form dropped and with a squad stacked with midfielders it's hardly surprising there was some chopping and changing. Didn't he join the squad quite late in the window? there's every possibility that AVB would have been working with the squad he had in place before Eriksens arrival on a system so when a player joins late on in the window there's naturally going to be a bit of rethinking going on.
 
Re: Tim Sherwood - Head Coach

wahey at this point with more than a hundred submissions its 84% who want some other than sherwood.

so it looks like sherwood is here to stay !
 
Re: Tim Sherwood - Head Coach

I think it's a bit of a myth that Eriksen's form dropped. He had one poor game against West Ham where everyone was rubbish(apart from Townsend) and then he found himself as a bit part player for the next couple of months.
 
Re: Tim Sherwood - Head Coach

How will TS respond to confirmation by Ajax spokesperson that we have contacted them about FDB? Must be difficult for anyones ego
 
Re: Tim Sherwood - Head Coach

A game he had one day to prepare for and a Chiriches and Capoue in central defence pairing against an Allardyce aerial bombardment

No context allowed here mate, not with regards to the post to which this was responding ;-)
 
Re: Tim Sherwood - Head Coach

Sherwood is a kunt. Yes. Now please show me the problem.


.


The problem is that the kunt in question does not have this club's interests at heart, and is a liability when it comes to presenting our club to potential sponsors, stadium rights people, etc. Much like his heroes boastful media daliances/using illiteracy as a defence, etc, this sort of thing doesn't go over well when trying to get people to fund projects which will help our club leap forward. Aside from which, his kuntiness has left him belligerently hanging onto strategies which have cost us points. Imagine, juuuuuuust imagine, if he'd actually modified a bit in some matches and placed some emphasis on defensive shape/a proper deep-lying midfielder? Whenever he did do this with Bentaleb, it worked fine. So why, you have to ask, does old kunty not continue to develop these ideas?

6 weeks ago, I was happy to be open-minded and (indeed) felt I was. His behaviour since has thrown me firmly against him. Hope I gave you enough examples BTW, I'd be happy to provide more…we haven't even gone into how this sort of character potentially makes players feel...
 
Re: Tim Sherwood - Head Coach

http://www.tottenhamjournal.co.uk/t...ies_but_carroll_could_be_the_answer_1_3577910


Sherwood: Spurs miss Modric’s qualities, but Carroll could be the answer

Tottenham head coach Tim Sherwood
By Ben Pearce, Tottenham correspondent
Tuesday, April 29, 2014
11:59 AM



Tim Sherwood believes Tottenham have failed to replace Luka Modric, the pass master who “assists the assister”, but he feels Tom Carroll could be the solution.


Tom Carroll
Spurs’ best side in recent memory featured Gareth Bale, Luka Modric and Rafael van der Vaart, who all played their parts as Harry Redknapp’s side reached the Champions League quarter-finals in 2011.

And, while much has been made of Bale’s absence this season, Sherwood thinks that Modric’s talents were similarly vital.

As a disappointing season comes to an end, Spurs’ head coach feels the Croatian’s creative qualities are missing from the midfield.

However, he believes that 21-year-old Carroll, who is nearing the end of his season-long loan with QPR, could fill that void at White Hart Lane – and he admits he tried to recall the England Under-21 international in the January transfer window.


Nabil Bentaleb has been an unused substitute in the last four games
“I could go on for ever about this, it’s just about having a blend in different areas of the field and different types of players in different areas of the field, and I just think the squad misses that a little bit,” said Sherwood.

“Sometimes you can turn around and look to make a change, and it’s not always a like-for-like change that you want to make.

“Sometimes you want to bring someone on to make a difference, a different type, and I just think the blend’s not fantastic. But that takes time to work with and it’s also in the recruitment process of the club.

“Sandro and [Etienne] Capoue are similar, in statue and in the way they break up the game. I think Paulinho’s a little bit different, he likes to break forward into the box.

“But we miss that player - I’m not saying [Mousa] Dembele can’t do it because he can pick it up and he can dribble – but we miss someone who moves that ball and passes it between the lines very quickly, and he assists the assister.

“Gareth Bale needed that ball very quickly and I think Luka Modric got it to him very quickly. I think Tom Carroll was that player - he can do that, absolutely. I tried to bring Tom back [in January], it just wasn’t possible.”

So was that the reason for Nabil Bentaleb’s rapid promotion at Spurs? Was Sherwood hoping that he could provide the necessary verve and incision in the midfield?

“No, he’s a different type of player,” said the head coach. “I think he’s got a bit of everything, Nabil. I think he can get up and back, and he can also score.

“We haven’t seen that because he’s not had that freedom to get forward in the games he’s played.”

Bentaleb featured in 19 of Sherwood’s first 22 games in charge at Tottenham, including nine successive starts.

However, the 19-year-old has not appeared since the 4-0 defeat at Liverpool on March 30 and has been an unused substitute for the last four games.

“Really I’ve protected him by taking him out of the spotlight,” said Sherwood. “We’ve been talking about our homegrown players, and I took him out of it.

“He’s been unlucky not to be playing, but I’m trying to protect him – and I think Manchester United did the same with [Adnan] Januzaj. He’s not featured in the last month or so.

“Sometimes a young boy can’t go in and stay in forever. It’s an art of when to put them in and when to bring them back, but he [Bentaleb] isn’t shying away, and he wants to play more than anyone.

“He has his head in his hands when I name the team and he isn’t in it, but unfortunately I’m doing it for his own benefit. You’ve got to be cruel to be kind in the long run.”

Asked if he feels the Spurs fans weren’t appreciating Bentaleb, Sherwood replied: “It’s a bit of that, and a bit of the fact that I think he needs a rest and someone else needed to come in there and do the job.”

Follow me on Twitter @BenPearceSpurs

-----------


Actually talks a lot of sense here


Carroll has been talked up by a few of us for ages…in fact, I was hoping he'd get him back in January! His work with Bentaleb has been great, no qualms there. But his 'observations' sound about as rudimentary as kid who watches football. I agree with Rossi, what's so impressive about his 'observations'? Christ, I was banging on about how much the loss of Modric would hurt us when we sold him, it doesn't take a rocket scientist! In fact, everything he's said there has been said here by (as Scara said) us internet chobbers. FFS…grrrrrrrrr….:ross:
 
Re: Tim Sherwood - Head Coach

Keeping Timmeh would be a temporary solution, so why not go for a temporary solution that involves a professional doing the job they're paid to do?

Because we know that TS can get results, no matter what you think of him he has gotten us results. A new temp Manager may not get results.
 
Re: Tim Sherwood - Head Coach

Not gonna worry about how potentially **** the next manager is until I'm done celebrating Twuntwood's dismissal.
 
Back