Re: Do you want Tim Sherwood to stay as manager?
They're not objective because they ignore so many factors.
Using Statto's logic I could claim that Lloris is the best keeper to ever exist because of yesterday's 100% save ratio, or that Rose is the world's greatest striker because of his 100% goals to shots ratio.
Quite. Sherwood is also operating with a different squad of players, with a different wages budget, in a different era to say, Gerry Francis or George Graham.
The amount of variables is just too immense to give these stats even an ounce of credibility.
Would Sherwood have the best % of all Tottenham managers in the universe ever if he was managing the likes of Ruel Fox, Gary Doherty and Stuart Nethercott? I think not. Comparisons to last seasons results are also meaningless: the premier league has changed, players have moved clubs and it consists of different teams.
The stats that are relevant to any Tim Sherwood argument, are progressive, cumulative stats compiled throughout his own reign at Spurs; and these will only serve to illuminate trends of his tenureship. Even then they don't account for days like yesterday, where one of the most inept managerial performances you are likely to see hampered our efforts.
Hence, I base (and always will) my opinion on what I see on the pitch. Otherwise, based on a sample of yesterday's game like Scara says - all we have to do is cross from the right, get Rose in the box, and we'll have the deadliest left back to ever have played the game. Every time Ade crosses to Rose when he is isolated with his marker we score. If we can do that 4 or 5 times every game we'll win the league.
We should base our whole attacking philosophy around Ade cross to Rose.