Or for not working hard enough when getting games
i don't think Poch would continue to give him chances if he wasn't working hard enough - (although perhaps this is why he is being used sparingly?) probably more that his style is somewhat languid
Or for not working hard enough when getting games
i don't think Poch would continue to give him chances if he wasn't working hard enough - (although perhaps this is why he is being used sparingly?) probably more that his style is somewhat languid
When he came on against Wycombe I watched him closely and was mighty impressed at how industrious he was from the word go. He was chasing back, tackling, harrying and generally hunting down the ball all over the park. In fact I honestly don't think he could have worked any harder.Hey Poch is the boss but I think Onomah is the laziest player I've seen come through for some time
The guy must have ability to be held in such high regard but I've seen pretty much every game he has had first team wise and I've never seen him work remotely hard
When he came on against Wycombe I watched him closely and was mighty impressed at how industrious he was from the word go. He was chasing back, tackling, harrying and generally hunting down the ball over the park. In fact I honestly don't think he could have worked any harder.
So I can only guess people are not particularly watching him off the ball and stuff.
Well if the Wycombe game is anything to go by he has that too now. He has tons of ability on the ball, no question about that, his problem is he seldom seems to do anything much to catch the eye. He scored against Gillingham but that game was a walk in the park so means nothing.No I didn't watch Wycombe
I've seen him play most games not All though
I've said it before but all the ability in the world doesn't get you far without a great work ethic
Well if the Wycombe game is anything to go by he has that too now. He has tons of ability on the ball, no question about that, his problem is he seldom seems to do anything much to catch the eye. He scored against Gillingham but that game was a walk in the park so means nothing.
I'd love for him to come on late in a big game and score the winner, then we might start to see lift-off - with us fans as much as with his own career.
I am beginning to think Poch should give Oduwa a chance.
I missed the first hour, though I know we went 2-0 up but Liverpool scored a pen just before half time. They equalised in the opening minutes of the second half and scored a third from a short corner in the 82nd minute. No idea how that last one was allowed to happen as Onomah was initially marking out there and then got called back into the box.
From what I have seen (from the 65th minute onwards), Liverpool are pressing us really high and our back line are struggling to get the ball past the halfway line. They have been more aggressive and definitely have a physical edge on our lads (size and fitness). I can't say that any of our lads look close to being first team ready today, only KWP has come close. I'll look around for the opening 60 mins later as Onomah looks to have moved from #8 to #10 in the second half (and not looked good), whilst the commentators seem to be saying that we were the dominant side of the first half.
@Yoof is Muscatt a natural left footer? He looked quite uncomfortable on it.
Muscatt is right-footed and frankly, not very good. We were much the better side until Muscatt gave away the penalty to make it 1-2, from there on Liverpool grew into the game and deserved to win in the end. Onomah was better 1st half but still poor overall, he just seems to be going backwards now and I think really needs to be playing games elsewhere at this point. I thought Amos was probably the pick of our players and Edwards showed his ability with his goal but was understandably rusty given it was his first game after being out for so long.
I thought Amos was on loan at Southend?
That is at least the second time that you have made up that nonsense.... Neither of them were 'kicked around and injured'. Mason's injuries were nothing to do with being kicked and Kane didn't have any injury problems.Not for good technical players like we are producing now. Kane and Mason got kicked around and quickly injured every time Timmeh packed them off to lower league
I thought his work rate was fine against Wycombe, it was his quality that was seriously lacking in that game.Well if the Wycombe game is anything to go by he has that too now. He has tons of ability on the ball, no question about that, his problem is he seldom seems to do anything much to catch the eye. He scored against Gillingham but that game was a walk in the park so means nothing.
I'd love for him to come on late in a big game and score the winner, then we might start to see lift-off - with us fans as much as with his own career.
Yes, 37 > 2That is at least the second time that you have made up that nonsense.
That is at least the second time that you have made up that nonsense.... Neither of them were 'kicked around and injured'. Mason's injuries were nothing to do with being kicked and Kane didn't have any injury problems.
Kane played in the lower leagues for Orient (5 goals in 18 games) and Millwall (9 goals in 27 games and received Millwall's young player of the year award). He got a Metatarsal injury while on loan at Norwich (who were in the Premier League so it wasn't a 'lower league loan' where he got injured as you claimed. One (reasonably minor) injury over 3 seasons of loans is not bad at all and doesn't suggest that he was being "kicked around" at all. The question here should simply be whether Kane benefited from the loan moves that he made? I would argue that he did and I think Kane himself has said on several occasions that they benefited him.Kane's foot got broken at Norwich and Mason's ankle problems at Doncaster came from poor tackles.