Bedfordspurs
Mark Falco
Still need to make payments out though€55m + add ons. So €11m amortisation. They've sold more than that already.
Your thinking PsR
I’m thinking do they still comply with Spanish rules
Still need to make payments out though€55m + add ons. So €11m amortisation. They've sold more than that already.
Still need to make payments out though
Your thinking PsR
I’m thinking do they still comply with Spanish rules
Yeah Spain stick to the rulesThey won't be allowed to register new players if they don't.
Yeah Spain stick to the rules
I can’t see what changed with them
They did loosen them up a bit last summer. They're allowed to spend a certain percentage of any fees they bring in and any wages they get off their books.
Thought that was always the rule. Did something change?
La liga sets out what someone can spend. They can go over that if it's matched by sales, cutting costs or raising revenue. They even had an app that would show clubs if they could sign a player.
They increased the percentages to stimulate signings. Not sure if that was just for last season or is still in effect.
Back to where he started. He was one of those overlooked when the terrible Josep Maria Bartomeu was in charge at Barca and thier youth stopped getting a chance.Dani Olmo to Barca.
thats a bit on the low side, chelsea really do not want to sell to usChelsea and Atletico Madrid are close to finalising the deals for Conor Gallagher and Samu Omorodion after agreeing on a new fee of £38m (€42m) for each player, Sky Sports News understands
That’s a huge fee for a guy with a year on his contract whose best season was his one on loanthats a bit on the low side, chelsea really do not want to sell to us
That’s a huge fee for a guy with a year on his contract whose best season was his one on loan
Funny bit though is their getting back a guy who hasn’t played much senior football at all
But then they are £35m downThey're not signing him to play. They're just trading assets and cooking the books in the process.
They're not signing him to play. They're just trading assets and cooking the books in the process.
But then they are £35m down
£50m and £10m would mean Bournemouth pay £3million less to Liverpool but with the same net income.I reckon Skipp might move to them the following day. Both at inflated fees. Say £65m and £25m
£50m and £10m would mean Bournemouth pay £3million less to Liverpool but with the same net income.
Unlike the PSR games, there's incentive for the fees to be somewhat understated this time.