zin
Anthony Gardner
You've raised the Chelsea point by misunderstanding what I said. When I wrote the below I wasn't referring to Chelsea's previous meeting with Barcelona but their forthcoming one where you will no doubt blame the referee over phantom poor decisions because that's what you do, you build irrational conspiracies and refuse to admit when you are wrong.
I've also noted however how you fail to mention the death threats the Norwegian referee received after the match, no doubt you feel death threats are justified based on what happened. This followed the 2005 encounter when Frisk - a self confessed Chelsea supporter as a child (surely should not have been refereeing a Chelsea match no?) received death threats as well and quit the game.
Your ability to select "facts" and go on a tangent on them truly is outstanding, Barca are the qunts, Chelsea are the victims and the referees in both cases are the Barca loving idiots who invited death threats from the victims.
Chelsea likely next where no doubt we'll see some more dodgy refeering decisions deny those nice boys from Fulham a deserved Final appearance against a Real Madrid team who have had the hardest route to the final ever.
I've also noted however how you fail to mention the death threats the Norwegian referee received after the match, no doubt you feel death threats are justified based on what happened. This followed the 2005 encounter when Frisk - a self confessed Chelsea supporter as a child (surely should not have been refereeing a Chelsea match no?) received death threats as well and quit the game.
Your ability to select "facts" and go on a tangent on them truly is outstanding, Barca are the qunts, Chelsea are the victims and the referees in both cases are the Barca loving idiots who invited death threats from the victims.
Last edited: