• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

The midweek/weekend games thread

whos fatter?

  • grant holt

    Votes: 2 10.5%

  • mark viduka

    Votes: 17 89.5%
  • Total voters
    19
United draws with Liverpool
Everton beats Chelsea
Sunderland beats Arsenal
Tottenham beats Saudi Sportswashing Machine
I drink myself into a coma

It's on!
 
Tony Pulis to send DVD compilation of bad tackles to the FA to highlight inconsistency in how Stoke are judged

:ross: :ross: :ross:
 
Pulis is free highlight whatever he likes, but he cannot possibly claim Stoke are hard done by. They're a bunch of thugs.
 
what about shawcross rugby tackling players at corners nearly every game ?

if i was reffing stoke that's the first thing i'd look for. fudge knows how they kept getting away with it
 
Jordinho said:
Tony Pulis to send DVD compilation of bad tackles to the FA to highlight inconsistency in how Stoke are judged

:ross: :ross: :ross:
Click to expand...

He's an idiot, for every tackle you have seen a red card you could probably find one that has not been given.

But for every stoke foul that has not been booked you can probably find hundreds that are similar and have been booked.
 
Spursalot said:
He's an idiot, for every tackle you have seen a red card you could probably find one that has not been given.

But for every stoke foul that has not been booked you can probably find hundreds that are similar and have been booked.
Click to expand...

Shouldn't that be the other way round? For every booking there's a hundred Stoke fouls that hasn't been booked.
 
Jordinho said:
Shouldn't that be the other way round? For every booking there's a hundred Stoke fouls that hasn't been booked.
Click to expand...

erm... Isn't that exactly the same as what i said? :ross: maybe i wasn't clear..



'But for every stoke foul that has not been booked you can probably find hundreds of similar fouls that have been booked.'

Is that clearer? Or am i just confused in general..
 
Last edited:
Spursalot said:
erm... Isn't that exactly the same as what i said? :ross: maybe i wasn't clear..



'But for every stoke foul that has not been booked you can probably find hundreds of similar fouls that have been booked.'

Is that clearer? Or am i just confused in general..
Click to expand...

I don't know. Are the fouls BY Stoke or ON Stoke?
 
Okay, but why would Pulis complain about fouls by Stoke that hasn't been booked? This is getting complicated. :)
 
Jordinho said:
Okay, but why would Pulis complain about fouls by Stoke that hasn't been booked? This is getting complicated. :)
Click to expand...

He wouldn't which is why he's an idiot for trying to get the referees to looks closer at the fouls committed by teams.

Consistency = Stoke rarely ending a match with 11 players. :p
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back