The Match of the Day Thread

[Spoonman]

I read that the chairman of BBC believes the "show" should have less highlights of matches and "it should be built around ANALysis and examination of the match to give viewers a greater insight to the match"
Just what we need more blokes or ladettes who could never get a job managing a team telling a lot of armchair experts what is blood obvious to anyone who has watched a game.

Ridiculous isn't it. They are so out of touch. The story is on the BBC sport website with a comments section. Pretty much every comment is saying the same thing. No! We want more highlights and less chat. Will they listen to their own readers?

I always wonder how much the BBC, SKY, TNT pay all these pundits, some of whom are barely literate. It's a criminal waste of money.

 

[Lilbaz]

I read that the chairman of BBC believes the "show" should have less highlights of matches and "it should be built around ANALysis and examination of the match to give viewers a greater insight to the match"
Just what we need more blokes or ladettes who could never get a job managing a team telling a lot of armchair experts what is blood obvious to anyone who has watched a game.

There's only 20 mins of highlights as is.

 

[Robbo]

Pundit salary is probably cheaper than more of the actual football.

 

[K.D.D.D.D.Soc]

Looking forward next season with their sexy new presenters, if they don't work out I'm sure Graham Norton, Zoe Ball and Nadia Hussian can replace them. They could make it a lot more fun if viewers could vote on results of the games.