• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

The Low Camera Angle

I think the merging becomes a problem when the threads are huge with many concurrent subtopics. These would be better if split into smaller threads that allow people to choose what to look at. The transfer thread is a case in point.

This topic is a good example of where threads should be merged. There is only so much people can say about the camera angle, so why not keep it in one place where it is easily found by those who are interested.

As an example, we now have a thread on Defoe, one on Adebayor, one on 'Adebayor or Defoe' and one about playing one up front. I'm pretty sure there's a couple more somewhere dealing with the same things, just from a slightly different angle. How different the angle needs to be is down to the opinion of the mods.
 
Infractons for Arc and dingdongo. Let that be a warning to the rest of you

10038599.jpg
 
Low angle is so much better, I sit in the upper stand but it's not that high really. The high angle camera feels like it's sitting on top of the ****eral on the roof.
 
I don't like the low angle because it doesn't show the exploits of our play. Higher up you get a fantastic view of our counter attacking exploits.

I'm surprised they show it on the lower level, because surely the club wants to show of its assets.
 
I don't get why we have to switch to that GHod awful camera angle everytime we play in the Europa League. I absolutely despise it. You don't get the overview, all the action going on on the far side of the pitch you can barely see, and yes, it reminds me too much of Scumbury. I have no idea how anyone can prefer it to our just perfect normal camera angle. Completely beyond me.
 
I don't like the low angle because it doesn't show the exploits of our play. Higher up you get a fantastic view of our counter attacking exploits.

I'm surprised they show it on the lower level, because surely the club wants to show of its assets.

More likely that either the club or uefa want sponsor boards to be more visible.
 
I don't get why we have to switch to that GHod awful camera angle everytime we play in the Europa League. I absolutely despise it. You don't get the overview, all the action going on on the far side of the pitch you can barely see, and yes, it reminds me too much of Scumbury. I have no idea how anyone can prefer it to our just perfect normal camera angle. Completely beyond me.

The other camera is too high. The players look tiny, the pitch looks massive, the game feels slower and therefore less exciting.
 
Back