Time to resuscitate this thread and get some decent arguments on going...
WE NEED A HOLDING MIDFIELDER
It seems that the current fad is "double pivot" and this has been the argument of those who are against the holder/DM. Two players who are equally comfortable in defending, have spatial awareness to position themselves correctly and above all the intelligence to read their midfield partner's position and compensate accordingly.
This is fine if you can afford to pay 30 mill each for your pivot components, fork out the 100K salary that comes with it and ward off the competition from teams that can offer the same plus CL football. But we are not in that elite league...
From experience in smallish companies, I know that it is far easier for us to identify and recruit individuals who are good in specific tasks than it is to get experienced and outstanding all rounders, who invariably are cherry picked by the big boys. Then it is up to us to balance the people we recruit so that their positives out balance the negatives of others. It's the only way a small company can compete.
Bentaleb, Mason and Dembele have all been used as double pivot components but to be honest they are jacks of all trades and masters of none... To me we have one potentially outstanding player in the team and that is Alli - he could be our Vieira or Yaya in the next couple of years. We know when those two were most successful - when they had a holding midfielder playing along them... Vieira with Petit/Gilberto; Yaya with Barry.
I sort of get the impression that Poch is starting to see this too... why else would you play Dier there? Only problem is that Dier is a CB - not a holder.