• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

The Current State of Spurs (and some sympathy for Thomas Frank)

It's a good thing if the players can execute it. If we are barely managing a shot on goal, then the methods aren't working. There needs to be one base way of playing. It's our foundation. It's what the team should be coached on at the beginning. The other methods need to develop once we get one right. We have zero right at the moment.
He did have a base way at beginning and people werent impressed with it. Think he figured out the best way to play with what we got.

We were harder to beat and scored from set pieces. It likely wasn't sustainable but it may have been if we got thru to this window and summer. It wasn't a great watch but neither is this and we are losing.

I tell you what. I would like us to go back to aug/sept when we were scrambling results. Now we are just getting ding dong done.

Again our summer window wasn't great considering the board knew we were heading into champs league. Knew since May Son was going and did naff all about it

I have no hope for the next couple of games
 
Yup, who’d have thought that when your home form is actually relegation zone level for over 12 months then fans would become critical and we’d end up in a negative spiral… hopefully the painful rebuild shall finally take a turn for the better next month after half a decade of shoddy wheeler-dealing which has left us with a Curate’s Egg of a squad.

View attachment 21068
But but injures and we concentrating on the cup!
 
He did have a base way at beginning and people werent impressed with it. Think he figured out the best way to play with what we got.

We were harder to beat and scored from set pieces. It likely wasn't sustainable but it may have been if we got thru to this window and summer. It wasn't a great watch but neither is this and we are losing.

I tell you what. I would like us to go back to aug/sept when we were scrambling results. Now we are just getting ding dong done.

Again our summer window wasn't great considering the board knew we were heading into champs league. Knew since May Son was going and did naff all about it

I have no hope for the next couple of games
It was more a case of we/Frank got figured out after the first few games. Teams could see all we did was sit there and try to defend, with any attack plan being give it to Kudus or just throw it into the box.

Defensively it was never sustainable frequently inviting pressure and since teams worked that out they would easily negate Kudus and ask 'Ok, what else have you got?' And the answer has been not a lot....
 
I just do not think our squad is as good as a lot of us fans think it is.
I didn't see anyone saying at the start of the season they expected to be challenging top 4. The consensus seemed to be around 6-8 which seems pretty fair. Everyone agrees that the squad needs improvement, but the quality of squads across the board outside 3 or 4 clubs is nothing special.

It can be dressed up any way you want, the quality of football played this season and sitting 14th in the league is nowhere near par for this squad....
 
I just do not think our squad is as good as a lot of us fans think it is.

Who’d have thunk that after missing out on 2 proven Premier League attackers who migh’ve filled the void left by Kulusevski, Son plus Maddison and instead pinning our hopes on a prodigious journeyman who makes Bryan Gill look like an elite weightlifter whilst reinforcing our midfield with an old fashioned DMF who struggles to pass forwards that we’d continue the bottom half form which which has seen us average just 1.3 points per match for over 100 PL games…

IMG_5171.jpeg
 
I just do not think our squad is as good as a lot of us fans think it is.

One more win than Leeds, only one club below us that isn't openly in the relegation battle, unable to string a set of results together, one of only two clubs to give up points to Wolves .. list goes on. The squad isn't that bad either.

And the excuses have started .. it's so frustrating, we all know where this goes from here.
 
I think you're perhaps being a little harsh on Frank. Palhinha wasn't a "primary" target of the club. He was a late summer stop gap loan that Frank agreed to so he had enough bodies to tackle a busy season. I can't imagine Spurs coping with the workload with just the other 4 options. That's assuming there was no way back for Biss who is a completely different player anyway. Frank just made a logical decision.

Personally, I think the fan narrative about Pal being our number 6 messiah is massively overstated. He's in his thirties and Frank is just going to manage his workload and keep his body as fresh as he can. We also can't have it both ways. We can't berate Frank for his brand of football and endorse Palhinha's inclusion at the same time. That's your classic dichotomy. So Frank uses him tactically when it makes sense to do so. He's also played very well at times this season. Frank's certainly not in a position to build things around him like he did with Norgard. As for him, he's 9 months older than Palhinha and only managed 3 appearances for the other lot so far this season. That tells it's own story, but endorses our own.

Looking for root causes. Once again it comes back to recruitment for me. That recruitment suffers from club brand as we can't seem to attract the first choices right now even though we probably have the budget. Hopefully, we'll supplement our 3 younger midfielders with one or two more in the next couple of windows and we can move beyond Pal and Bents.

Hmmm. If you look back at the summer, Frank was very active in getting Palhinha to the club; the delay in securing the deal was that Bayern wanted 47 mill and we wanted a season loan. But make no mistake, he wasn’t a body Frank agreed to for numbers at all (that was Muani and only because of Solanke).

One thing. I didn’t say anything about ‘building a side around Palhinha’. I just stated an expectation in how/why he’d be used. Instead, Frank spent the better part of 10 games figuring out that doubling down on the safety he can offer by pairing him with Bentancur was not exactly the way to use him to the benefit of the team.

Yes. Recruitment has been an enormous issue for years in terms of its inconsistency. We have in that period signed some great players (VdV, Romero, Porro, Bergvall, Gray, Kulusevski, Udogie) and we have either failed to properly develop players like Scarlett, Devine, and Donley or failed at the academy level overall (I find that hard to believe given how successful the academy teams were a few years back). We have to get it right with Mikey Moore (I’d let him blossom at Rangers a while longer) and I worry that we will get it wrong with Williams-Barnett in terms of development if we’re not careful. There are issues for sure.
 
Hmmm. If you look back at the summer, Frank was very active in getting Palhinha to the club; the delay in securing the deal was that Bayern wanted 47 mill and we wanted a season loan. But make no mistake, he wasn’t a body Frank agreed to for numbers at all (that was Muani and only because of Solanke).

One thing. I didn’t say anything about ‘building a side around Palhinha’. I just stated an expectation in how/why he’d be used. Instead, Frank spent the better part of 10 games figuring out that doubling down on the safety he can offer by pairing him with Bentancur was not exactly the way to use him to the benefit of the team.

Yes. Recruitment has been an enormous issue for years in terms of its inconsistency. We have in that period signed some great players (VdV, Romero, Porro, Bergvall, Gray, Kulusevski, Udogie) and we have either failed to properly develop players like Scarlett, Devine, and Donley or failed at the academy level overall (I find that hard to believe given how successful the academy teams were a few years back). We have to get it right with Mikey Moore (I’d let him blossom at Rangers a while longer) and I worry that we will get it wrong with Williams-Barnett in terms of development if we’re not careful. There are issues for sure.
I can understand why Frank's tenure so far has been so disappointing to you if you think these are great players. None of them are great, a few might have the potential to achieve that but to actually call them great right now is hyperbole.
 
I can understand why Frank's tenure so far has been so disappointing to you if you think these are great players. None of them are great, a few might have the potential to achieve that but to actually call them great right now is hyperbole.

Sigh. What I failed to mention is that those were within the remit of a signing policy which never EVER goes for the top top talent because we would never pay those wages, thus ALL the signings I called out were based on youth and potential. And yes, in THAT regard, they are great signings. Porro is the outlier as he is a City surplus.

I thought it would be obvious that we ALL agree this football club does not sign ready-made world class talent. That all we’ve done for a long time now is sign up and comers. Modric, Berbatov, Eriksen, Dele, Toby, Jan, all were ‘tier down’ or ‘young developers’. In fact, it a what Poch did all the more remarkable. So in THAT regard, yes, the players I have named are ‘great’ signings.

You want to know what made me laugh? That we bothered with Mourinho and Conte. They must’ve cracked up. A couple of high paid years plus massive pay-off knowing they wouldn’t get what they needed and further knowing when it all went belly-up, they’d have the club to blame.

Finally, understand that for me, Frank’s tenure has been disappointing because he is not producing a type of football I like; he is not even producing a type of football which is secure. It is nothing. Can you tell me what it is? Blame the players all you want, but can you tell me that he can’t get better from this by playing better football? You can’t (not honestly).

Many many years ago, I spent time with Frank Arnesen at the old Lodge. He essentially told me that the policy he believed in was sign low and young in numbers and see what stuck. The rest? Low-risk losses you could make up with a couple of ‘bingo’ moments. Levy adored Arnesen and believed in that as an economic standard. It’s why we lost out on top players so many times; he wouldn’t pay and he believed in this model. Losing Arnesen to Chelski broke him. And we have paid a price ever since. Poch? One of the greatest strokes of luck he ever had, and if you remember, the moment Paul Mitchell wanted real money (in wages) to secure two players and didn’t get it, he was gone.

Are the Lewis’ the same?
 
Last edited:
Hmmm. If you look back at the summer, Frank was very active in getting Palhinha to the club; the delay in securing the deal was that Bayern wanted 47 mill and we wanted a season loan. But make no mistake, he wasn’t a body Frank agreed to for numbers at all (that was Muani and only because of Solanke).

One thing. I didn’t say anything about ‘building a side around Palhinha’. I just stated an expectation in how/why he’d be used. Instead, Frank spent the better part of 10 games figuring out that doubling down on the safety he can offer by pairing him with Bentancur was not exactly the way to use him to the benefit of the team.

Yes. Recruitment has been an enormous issue for years in terms of its inconsistency. We have in that period signed some great players (VdV, Romero, Porro, Bergvall, Gray, Kulusevski, Udogie) and we have either failed to properly develop players like Scarlett, Devine, and Donley or failed at the academy level overall (I find that hard to believe given how successful the academy teams were a few years back). We have to get it right with Mikey Moore (I’d let him blossom at Rangers a while longer) and I worry that we will get it wrong with Williams-Barnett in terms of development if we’re not careful. There are issues for sure.

If you have enough attacking guile, then you can play Paulinha. And therein lies the problem.
 
Sigh. What I failed to mention is that those were within the remit of a signing policy which never EVER goes for the top top talent because we would never pay those wages, thus ALL the signings I called out were based on youth and potential. And yes, in THAT regard, they are great signings. Porro is the outlier as he is a City surplus.

I thought it would be obvious that we ALL agree this football club does not sign ready-made world class talent. That all we’ve done for a long time now is sign up and comers. Modric, Berbatov, Eriksen, Dele, Toby, Jan, all were ‘tier down’ or ‘young developers’. In fact, it a what Poch did all the more remarkable. So in THAT regard, yes, the players I have named are ‘great’ signings.

You want to know what made me laugh? That we bothered with Mourinho and Conte. They must’ve cracked up. A couple of high paid years plus massive pay-off knowing they wouldn’t get what they needed and further knowing when it all went belly-up, they’d have the club to blame.

Finally, understand that for me, Frank’s tenure has been disappointing because he is not producing a type of football I like; he is not even producing a type of football which is secure. It is nothing. Can you tell me what it is? Blame the players all you want, but can you tell me that he can’t get better from this by playing better football? You can’t (not honestly).

Many many years ago, I spent time with Frank Arnesen at the old Lodge. He essentially told me that the policy he believed in was sign low and young in numbers and see what stuck. The rest? Low-risk losses you could make up with a couple of ‘bingo’ moments. Levy adored Arnesen and believed in that as an economic standard. It’s why we lost out on top players so many times; he wouldn’t pay and he believed in this model. Losing Arnesen to Chelski broke him. And we have paid a price ever since. Poch? One of the greatest strokes of luck he ever had, and if you remember, the moment Paul Mitchell wanted real money (in wages) to secure two players and didn’t get it, he was gone.

Are the Lewis’ the same?
If you mean relative to our standing they are great signings then I still kind don't agree. We've signed bigger names before, we've signed more talented players before, we've even signed players more on the cusp of greatness before. So again I can understand why you're so disappointed because you think they are better than they actually are.

I keep saying a different manager could in all likelyhood get us playing more attractive football, Ange just did that, so I have no disagreement there. What I disagree with is that we can play significantly better successful football.

For me I don't care who the manager is, Poch, Pep, Klopp (well maybe Klopp actually 😅), this side is average. It has no stand out talents. I think at its best with a Poch esque over performance it could be top 6 but again that's searching for the Messiah manager. It's far easier to just improve on the playing pool then it is finding the mythic manager who gets 100% out of every player.
 
Not always. Dembele and Wanyama/Dier worked fine and none of them were playmakers. Because the team was well drilled and we had a great system
We didn't win because we were a little bit too stodgy in midfield. Add that we had a world class Eriksen at the time and Kane a hybrid 9/10 then yes it worked, but we had very specific components that made that work. Those are not components that are easy to acquire or replicate.
 
Not always. Dembele and Wanyama/Dier worked fine and none of them were playmakers. Because the team was well drilled and we had a great system
I'm not saying you need to have a playmaker in a 2 period, just alongside Palonha you'd need someone with exceptional creative/passing/retention capabilities to make up for what he lacks - none of Dembele Wanyama & Dier were as limited on the ball.
 
If you mean relative to our standing they are great signings then I still kind don't agree. We've signed bigger names before, we've signed more talented players before, we've even signed players more on the cusp of greatness before. So again I can understand why you're so disappointed because you think they are better than they actually are.

I keep saying a different manager could in all likelyhood get us playing more attractive football, Ange just did that, so I have no disagreement there. What I disagree with is that we can play significantly better successful football.

For me I don't care who the manager is, Poch, Pep, Klopp (well maybe Klopp actually 😅), this side is average. It has no stand out talents. I think at its best with a Poch esque over performance it could be top 6 but again that's searching for the Messiah manager. It's far easier to just improve on the playing pool then it is finding the mythic manager who gets 100% out of every player.

Now you're just running up the metric pole. Of COURSE we've signed 'bigger names' before than the ones I highlit.

First off, no. Not 'relative to our standing', relative to our signing policy/recruitment policy over the years. That has little to do with standing and everything to do with how we chose to go about our transfer business (I am not saying whether I agree or not BTW). We never went big on wages to beat others to signings, and we never went toe-to-toe in term of transfer fee muscle either. I mean come on, we squeezed 100 mill out of Real Madrid for Bale and spent it on 7 players rather than one or two huge replacements. We should be grateful Eriksen came through, otherwise wow...

As for 'cusp of greatness', I gave you Modric, Berbatov and Dele (Bale too of course) so yes. So not earth-shattering stuff. However, your apparent enthusiasm to write off talent such as VdV, Romero, Udogie and Kulusevski is (for me) now becoming stubbornness. As for Gray and Bergvall, let's hope they stay at this club and get coached by a top talent sooner than later, otherwise you will see them in bigger sides doing very, very well because they are potentially great players. That's not 'emotional-positive-hyperbole', it's the truth. That we had to accelrate their development through poor squad planning and desperation last season is both a curse and a blessing.

As I see it, you're beating the drum of how I am 'overrating everything' on the playing side of our club. That's fine. Again, we'll have to agree to disagree.

You talk about 'successful' football. What is 'success' to you? What are you expecting? Title after title? Every fudging time we've got ourselves in a situation to build on some good architecture, we fudge it up by never buying blue-chip materials to go the extra mile. So essentially, you're beating a drum which EVERYONE on this forum knows; we do not buy the ready-baked, elite players. We speculate on a combination of bargains and talented youth. With respects, I think anyone who has followed this club for even a modicum of time knows this; you are hardly introducing a 'wild view' on matters in that regard.

Where I think perhaps you're getting wired crossed so far as my views are that I do believe we have BETTER players than you do, and I do believe we should doing BETTER with them. Again (and this is a very important point to re-emphasize) I do not think this side can go and win the Premier League, and I am not even sure this squad (if fully fit) could grab 4th or 5th spot (albeit I DO believe it's possible with the right set-up). However the same glaring holes exist in terms of squad depth (left-hand side) and quality/type (playmaker, passer, hey - even two of them!).

What you are asking for is an investment of (I would think in current prices plus wages) of somewhere in the region of 6-700 million pounds on players to lift the squad to 'title challenge calibre' (which of course will make minimal difference if the manager is lost on how to deploy them). I do not think the Lewis Family will do that. We're seeing 150 million touted as a 'warchest' and it is a fairy large sum of money, don't get me wrong, but truthfully it is this era's 90-100 million whereby we'll get the 'next tier down' player. I suppose we need to see what happens, but I am not holding my breath thinking we're going gangbusters this January. Truth be told, I think it'd be wiser to only buy essential depth and wait for the summer to see what direction we take (sticking with Frank or going elsewhere).

I absolutely disagree with you when it comes to manager. IMO you should very much care who the manager is. They set the tone in terms of personality and intent. The manager selects the players he wants based on the style he wants to play. So it is VERY important.

An area I think we need to seriously consider upgrading is Director of Football. Lange has never fully convinced me, Paratici was always a smooth operating plaster with an agenda who delivered for us but also cost us at times, and it is my belief that IF we pin our long-term hopes on Lange as the driver of our footballing operations, we will be drifting for some time. That being said, in the short-term, we should be doing MUCH better than we are and we can play significantly better football IMO.
 
Last edited:
Back