SteveAWOL
Barry Daines
I bet the balmy army will be reminiscing on the subject the next time Australia take to the field over here
I bet the balmy army will be reminiscing on the subject the next time Australia take to the field over here
The next big Aussie scandal is taking it's time, must be something in the archives surely?
In the World Cup semi-final between Australia and Sri Lanka at St George’s Park in 2003, the Aussies were on 34 after five overs when Aravinda de Silva was brought on to bowl. On his second delivery, Adam Gilchrist stepped forward to sweep, edged the ball on to his front pad, and watched it sail into the hands of Kumar Sangakkara, the wicketkeeper. The Sri Lankans made a sustained appeal. Rudi Koertzen, the umpire, shook his head. “Not out,” he said.
In True Colours, his wonderful autobiography, Gilchrist would later recall that he felt “strange” at that moment, perhaps a little confused. “So much discontent about umpiring, video decisions, and trust between players had been bubbling away,” he said. He then heard an emphatic voice in his head. “Go,” the voice said. “Walk”. As he made his way towards the pavilion, something odd happened. The Port Elizabeth crowd started cheering. They knew that he had made a gesture more important than mere winning and losing.
Later that day, Gilchrist sat in the viewing room. He had been shunned by some team-mates and wondered if his status in the dressing room would recover, but the voice in his mind was insistent: “You did the right thing.” Later, when Australia took the field, he caught Koertzen’s eye. He wondered if the umpire might have been embarrassed by his decision to walk, but he received a reassuring nod. “Congratulations,” Koertzen said. “It took a lot to do what you did, but we’d all be better off if there was more of it.”
100 ball cricket! I understand that the poor old duffers at the top want to get more people interested in (what was) the game, but what next? Under arm lobs so there are more sixes and fireworks with music? It's just not cricket, the games I played as a kid with the wicket chalked on a wall and six and out if you hit the ball over the factory wall was better than this.
100 ball cricket! I understand that the poor old duffers at the top want to get more people interested in (what was) the game, but what next? Under arm lobs so there are more sixes and fireworks with music? It's just not cricket, the games I played as a kid with the wicket chalked on a wall and six and out if you hit the ball over the factory wall was better than this.
You mean a big countdown, hopefully with The Final Countdown playing on loop throughout both innings, doesn't rev your engine? Weirdo.Cricket is losing all I love about it. Don't get me wrong I enjoy the T20 side of it but I think the balance we have now is perfect if I am honest. The Domestic League don't need anymore competitions.
You’re welcome! I ushered up the spirit of gutter boy for that one!!Essex: serious relegation fears...
You’re welcome! I ushered up the spirit of gutter boy for that one!!
Seriously though, it’s been over a year the bowlers have been bailing out the batsmen, about time the top order stepped up.
We were limp from the start to the end.
Not sure what the answer is.
Feels like another nail in the coffin as we walk towards the death of test cricket.