• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

The Centre Forward thread

Bishop said:
De Kettelare offers the option of being a 10 as well if Maddison/Kulu don't hit form and fitness but then can still offer up as a 9 if they are. QuIte a versatile option to have.
Click to expand...
He also made a move to a big club and flopped despite being a very talented player
He needs things that work for him imo
I like him but not sure if he is the right fit
 
Muttley said:
I'm wondering what our loan moves, if any, will be. Last year we obviously had Palinha and Muani.

The closer we get to the window shutting I think the more likely the club will look to plug some gaps using the loan system.

Perhaps it's too early for any speculation to start.
Click to expand...
There arent many, if any holes where an obvious loan move exists
 
Bedfordspurs said:
There arent many, if any holes where an obvious loan move exists
Click to expand...

True, but there are clubs like RM that have an Endrick. A restless player who is sitting behind the superstars and also wants first team action. We could buy RM a year, and even buy ourselves some time to pick up Kroupi.
 
billyiddo said:
I would go Jackson or Mikaudaze out of those options presented above.

Jackson misses a lot but i do agree with the idea that getting a high number of chances is a skill in of itself and he's a good contributer to all round play. I think we'd find a buyer for him if we wanted to move him on in a couple of years.
Click to expand...

We’ve got Richarlison already (assuming he stays), so the ‘Gets a lot of chances but misses most of them’ position feels like it’s already filled.

I’d go after Watkins. He’s gettable at a reasonable price, is PL proven over a number of seasons, and he would be an upgrade on both Richi and Richarlison.
 
Mikey10 said:
We’ve got Richarlison already (assuming he stays), so the ‘Gets a lot of chances but misses most of them’ position feels like it’s already filled.

I’d go after Watkins. He’s gettable at a reasonable price, is PL proven over a number of seasons, and he would be an upgrade on both Richi and Richarlison.
Click to expand...

Agreed, swapping out Richy for Jackson would just be for the sake of something new
 
Gutter Boy said:
£40m for a 31YO? That's an expensive 12 month stop gap
Click to expand...
If it's the difference between Champions League and Conference League it's not.

£40m for Watkins would be good - he'll score goals and link play and be a starter or second choice for three years. I'd say it's a very shrewd signing.
 
billyiddo said:
I think Jackson would be a big enough improvement in all round play to make it worthwile
Click to expand...
I worry for anyone at our club in the forward line who is vulnerable to the crowd becoming completely miserable about them. Jackson feels a shoe-in for this.

Perhaps it's the standards of Kane and Son we need to realise aren't normal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back