[video=youtube;_ZaL4LE5rio]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZaL4LE5rio&context=C3875a5cADOEgsToPDskJ2_GCZ0PNAZarUF69uBWzW[/video]
Cheers.
As you say, from the horse's mouth......
I guess he just wasn't registered for the NextGen Series, then?
[video=youtube;_ZaL4LE5rio]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZaL4LE5rio&context=C3875a5cADOEgsToPDskJ2_GCZ0PNAZarUF69uBWzW[/video]
Cheers.
As you say, from the horse's mouth......
I guess he just wasn't registered for the NextGen Series, then?
Random but Kyle Naughton banned for speeding.
http://www.edp24.co.uk/sport/norwic...ton_banned_for_speeding_in_norfolk_1_1203985?
charlietheyid; said:Caulker plays like kaboul
?À 2 Appearances ?À 1 Subbed Off ?À 1 Goal ?À 0 Assists ?À
A coming together between Tim Cahill and Lampard saw the ball loop over the BluesÔÇÖ defence and fortuitously into the path of Pienaar who controlled brilliantly on his chest and smashed beyond Petr Cech.
Pienaar, back at Goodison on loan from Spurs, was the man of the match, scoring the all-important first goal in the fifth minute and troubling Chelsea throughout.
Moyes also hailed Pienaar, who scored his first goal since returning to Everton on loan from Tottenham Hotspur. He said: "He got clapped by everyone at the end, some of the stuff he did was terrific. "I said to him at the end it was like he had never been away. Sometimes clubs just fit players and maybe that is the case. Maybe this just suits him.''
Pienaar 9 - seemed to be playing a free role although starting on the left, involved in everything positive going forward and took his goal superbly. MOTM
Pienaar - 9 - Flawless game, complete with flair. (MOTM)
Pienaar - 9 Fantastic from the wee man. Chased everything down, played with guile and it looks as though he's never been away.
Pienaar was far and away the best player on display the entire time he was on.
Peanuts 8 - Took his goal well, linked play, and made chelsea defenders look silly at times, particularly bosingwa
Pienaar 9 MOTM - has single handedly brought quality to our game, brilliant run and finish for his goal
?À 14 Appearances ?À 1 Unused Sub ?À 0 Goals ?À 0 Assists ?À
Also was it just me or did anyone else think Caulker was awesome up front in the dying minutes, on another day could have rescued us a point.
Don't think they announced one (MOTM), for me it would have been caulker or graham
Lost count of the amount of times caulker bailed rangel out of the sh1t today, by far caulkers best game and got to be one of rangels worst
I thought Caulker was gash today, as were the rest of the team.
?À 2 Appearances ?À 1 Subbed Off ?À 0 Goals ?À 0 Assists ?À
What?? Corluka?????? I do not think ....
Hm, I do not understand the change
For Corluka, I collapse ..................
Corluka out why exactly? Also do not understand the change.
Corluka is definitely one of the better, Castro weak .. Dutt is so stupid ..
?À 22 Appearances ?À 1 Subbed On ?À 2 Unused Sub ?À 0 Goals ?À 0 Assists ?À
Gylfi Sigurdsson had the chance to give Swansea an early lead after confusion between Kyle Naughton and Canaries keeper John Ruddy, but Russell Martin got there in the nick of time to block the shot.
Naughton survived penalty appeals for handball after blocking a Dyer shot and a cross from substitute Wayne Routledge and then came with inches of making it 4-1 as his rising angled drive was tipped onto the bar by a full-stretch Vorm.
For 20 mins. I thought we were going to slaughter them. One attack, & they slice through us like the proverbial knife through butter. How do they do that? Was Naughton AWOL?
Naughton, brilliant shot. Unlucky. Good tip on to the bar by Vorm
?À 2 Appearances ?À 1 Subbed Off ?À 1 Goal ?À 0 Assists ?À
?À 4 Appearances ?À 1 Subbed On ?À 1 Subbed Off ?À 0 Goals ?À 0 Assists ?À
obvously theres something there but i cant see it and to play him in midfield with kane on the left is madness...does jackett want the sack..left him on the whole game and took henry and wright off...what is this bullimic kid winger or midfielder
He has played on the wing and centre mid at spurs. In first half he played ok and made some good runs into the box. He's got good ball control. He looks promising IMO.
Thought Mason showed some good touches, as did Keogh and Wright used the ball much better than Jimmy.
Mason is not anywhere near a first team player
Mason played ok but don't ask me what position he played i couldn't tell you
Thought Mason had some good runs
?À 10 Appearances ?À 1 Subbed On ?À 7 Subbed Off ?À 2 Goals ?À 2 Assists ?À
Kane played ok.
Kane should not have played instead of ?ú500,000 Keogh
kane on the left is madness
?À 2 Appearances ?À 0 Goals ?À 0 Assists ?À
Smith - 6.5 - Started the game well and looked more solid than last week and got forward well.
Smith - 7 Keep thinking it's Howson with the number 14 shirt, so in that respect, p*ssed me off so doesn't get a higher rating. other than that he was alright and linked up well with Snodgrass.
Also, Smith and O'Dea ( yes O'Dea ) had solid games at the back.
?À 6 Appearances ?À 1 Subbed On ?À 1 Subbed Off ?À 1 Unused Sub ?À 0 Goals ?À 0 Assists ?À
White needs to drop back to left back, because he is not as good a winger as Townsend.
Townsend also looked pretty tinkled when Redfearn told him to sit down after our goal.
So Townsend came on and i thought did well, was constantly looking for the ball and made a few good crosses.
?À 3 Appearances ?À 1 Subbed On ?À 1 Subbed Off ?À 0 Goals ?À 0 Assists ?À
The trouble is that we've replaced Marshall with Jones and Bostock both of whom have not hit the ground running.
Bostock, for me was a very optimistic loan signing. He's a twinkle toes with a lot of nice touches, but he doesn't really influence games, no decisive balls or dribbles that open the opposition up. And he does very little when the oppsoition have the ball.
And rather tellingly two Exeter fans asked me why Bostock wasn't playing first half. I said I didn't know, especially considering he was on the pitch.
All the messing about over Marshall, neither Jones or Bostock so far look like being able to replace even half of his contribution.
?À 1 Appearances ?À 1 Subbed Off ?À 1 Unused Sub ?À 0 Goals ?À 0 Assists ?À
He joined on loan when we had loads of injures but now it seems to be so contested that I doubt he will get any game time whatsoever. We have Lallana and Puncheon as regular starters with Chaplow and de Ridder as back up, and if we switch to a 433 or 41212 or whatever you wanna call our formation against Millwalls then there's no real room for him if Lambert and Lallana are in the 'hole'.
May get further chances. Nigels thoughts are surely: 1st, team results; 2nd, Saints players; and 3rd, loan players. Falque would get no games at Spurs, so he's bound to do better here.
With the 5 sub rule I dunno. We have Hammond, Cork, Schneiderlin, Chaplow, Lallana, Puncheon, De Ridder, Falque all vying for 4 places which leaves 4 to go on the bench, but since we'll have Bart, Martin and a striker on the bench that only leaves 2 places - 1 of which would be used for a winger presumably, but Falque is very far down the order. I feel that he's gonna be wasted here now when we could've maybe got defensive backup on loan (which we could still do I suppose)
No, he's not our player. I'd much rather see Lallana, Puncheon, Chaplow, De Ridder and Guly getting games, as they are a part of our future. It's a shame for Yago, because he was probably hoping for some match experience, but I don't really understand what he's doing here.
Lallana gets injured: still puncheon, de Ridder and Chaplow. Say Chaplow gets injured? Still got Puncheon and de Ridder, not to mention Reeves and Holmes. Unless there's a MASSIVE injury crisis he's not even getting a look in.
The point I'm making is that on an average day he's not getting game time and only a massive injury crisis would allow him to play but if it reached that stage I'd rather change formation!
11 players on the field, lambert,lallana,sharp,davies,fonte and jos are starters. 5 places up for grabs with another 4 on the bench, its up to him to earn his place
?À 0 Appearances ?À 2 Unused Sub ?À
Why bring on haber and robertson and play them out of position? Wide right and on the pitch are neither of their positions. I thought the boy kudos was meant to be a wide player. Bringing they 2 on...
What would you have done Dave? Not that sure the options were on the bench. Kudos on for a start on the left seemed the only other option to me?
It won't be popular,but i thought Cilla was fecked,so put Haber in there and Millar wide,or as you say bring Kudos on,although he seems to favour the left
?À 12 Appearances ?À 2 Subbed Off ?À 0 Goals ?À 0 Assists ?À
Byrne sounds a nice lad and shows a good attitude not the typical Pem't big time Charlie.
OK, I am definately biased - but he actually is a nice, decent lad - and do not believe Bournemouth fans have yet seen how good a player he is. Hopefully he will be able to show them about February through to end of season.
?À 5 Appearances ?À 3 Clean Sheets ?À
?À 4 Appearances ?À 3 Subbed Off ?À 0 Goals ?À 1 Assist ?À
?À 15 Appearances ?À 2 Subbed On ?À 4 Subbed Off ?À 2 Goals ?À 0 Assists ?À
?À 22 Appearances ?À 5 Clean Sheets ?À
Wait, am I being an idiot? It says player has to be born after Jan 1st 1993? So how can a player be too young?
Brilliant stuff Zin
Agreed, it is strange. I guess he wasn't registered
I'm even more confused because the Youtube clip of him on the last page has got Rohan Ricketts at Spurs... recently... what's going on, am I in a timewarp?
I think hes too young, isnt he under 16?
2 Appearances ?À 1 Subbed Off ?À 0 Goals ?À 0 Assists ?À
Bassong off that is not good at all. Played better than what people are saying on this thread.
As soon as he went off we were struggling and it seemed to change the game.
I'd have said hamstring as well, but he seemed to be able to walk off without too much trouble? Didn't even seem to be limping.
Tight hamstring. Good job we've got two weeks without a game.
Looked like he went off as a precaution rather than anything too bad - fingers crossed anyway.
I thought he was rubbish and looked unfit. He got caught in possession a couple of times and seemed joined to the hip with Wardy.
I don't think it was Bassong that was rubbish. More like the total lack of options he had when in possession. Plus Blake was moaning at him for not hoofing it long in the first half. I felt sorry for Bassong, you can see he wanted to pass the ball forward but we were so weak in midfield he just had no-one to pass to.
Bassong was $$$$ing $$$$ today.
while he might have been "$$$$" it was only 1-1 when he went off...but he definitely wasn't at his best.
Bassong was holding the defence together he went off, commented at the time this was not good for the team. Berra came on and the rest is history, we had no cohesion or ability to stop them scoring. How anyone can say he was rubbish today, very strange thing to say when he was covering so much ground.
Must be shocking for Bassong to get the ball and realize there is no bugger to pass it too.
18 Appearances ?À 1 Clean Sheet ?À