Re: World Cup Group D - Uruguay, Costa Rica, England, Italy
So he's confirming it then?
So he's confirming it then?
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Suarez - Serial Biter
- Thread starter Mulletperm
- Start date
Robbo
Paul Walsh
Re: World Cup Group D - Uruguay, Costa Rica, England, Italy
Fifa now confirming they will investigate Suarez:
http://m.bbc.com/sport/football/28008605
Norwegian media actually quotes Fifa regulations stating that players can be banned for as long as two years - from all competitions, including the premier league.
Fifa now confirming they will investigate Suarez:
http://m.bbc.com/sport/football/28008605
Norwegian media actually quotes Fifa regulations stating that players can be banned for as long as two years - from all competitions, including the premier league.
DHSF
Les Ferdinand
Re: World Cup Group D - Uruguay, Costa Rica, England, Italy
Do you think Suarez did what he did to engineer a move away from Liverscum? He may be strane and weird etc but dont think he is stupid and naive. I wouldnt put it past him. Dont think the incident would deter the likes of Madrid and Barca. After all Madrid do have and have stuck by Pepe (albeit nothing as bad as Suarez)
Do you think Suarez did what he did to engineer a move away from Liverscum? He may be strane and weird etc but dont think he is stupid and naive. I wouldnt put it past him. Dont think the incident would deter the likes of Madrid and Barca. After all Madrid do have and have stuck by Pepe (albeit nothing as bad as Suarez)
milo
Jack L. Jones
Re: World Cup Group D - Uruguay, Costa Rica, England, Italy
No. I think that he did what he did because he is a dirty little **** who cannot control his temper
No. I think that he did what he did because he is a dirty little **** who cannot control his temper
Jurgen the German
Erik Thorstvedt
Re: World Cup Group D - Uruguay, Costa Rica, England, Italy
What a stupid comment, in more ways than one.
What a stupid comment, in more ways than one.
Jurgen the German
Erik Thorstvedt
Re: World Cup Group D - Uruguay, Costa Rica, England, Italy
Because Suarez has done it 3 times now
Because Suarez has done it 3 times now
SpursLodge
Nicola Berti
Re: World Cup Group D - Uruguay, Costa Rica, England, Italy
What, they only gave him 166/1, that's really tight. He should be getting more like £1500
What, they only gave him 166/1, that's really tight. He should be getting more like £1500
Rorschach
Sonny Walters
Re: World Cup Group D - Uruguay, Costa Rica, England, Italy
Very interesting to see how this pans out. At the very least he should be sent home in shame from the world cup, but I think FIFA might just latch on to this incident and come down very hard on Suarez. Their reputation is in the gutter at the moment so they must be seen to do the right thing here, and that is punish him severely.
Very interesting to see how this pans out. At the very least he should be sent home in shame from the world cup, but I think FIFA might just latch on to this incident and come down very hard on Suarez. Their reputation is in the gutter at the moment so they must be seen to do the right thing here, and that is punish him severely.
Last edited:
Whiffler
Jermaine Jenas
Re: World Cup Group D - Uruguay, Costa Rica, England, Italy
Not forgetting that FIFA banned The Kaiser from all footballing activities for 90 days?. His crime was wanting to be quizzed in German over Russia/Qatar finals allocation.
Suarez has disgraced football as a whole. Those who backed him before should also suffer. His Uruguay captain and manager should also be punished if they keep denying his actions. The bloke who tried closing the victim's shirt should be banned. I should be banned. Banners should be banned.
Oops .... may have gone too far there. So, keep it simple - 'contact counselling' for Mister Suarez.
Not forgetting that FIFA banned The Kaiser from all footballing activities for 90 days?. His crime was wanting to be quizzed in German over Russia/Qatar finals allocation.
Suarez has disgraced football as a whole. Those who backed him before should also suffer. His Uruguay captain and manager should also be punished if they keep denying his actions. The bloke who tried closing the victim's shirt should be banned. I should be banned. Banners should be banned.
Oops .... may have gone too far there. So, keep it simple - 'contact counselling' for Mister Suarez.
Robbo
Paul Walsh
Re: World Cup Group D - Uruguay, Costa Rica, England, Italy
Maybe they thought it was probable this would actually happen...?
Maybe they thought it was probable this would actually happen...?
Robbo
Paul Walsh
Re: World Cup Group D - Uruguay, Costa Rica, England, Italy
They could make it simple and just pull his teeth out.
They could make it simple and just pull his teeth out.
ricky2tricky4city
Steffen Freund
Re: World Cup Group D - Uruguay, Costa Rica, England, Italy
To be fair you'd get teeth marks even from a headbutt.....there's no avoiding those nashers
To be fair you'd get teeth marks even from a headbutt.....there's no avoiding those nashers
braineclipse
Steve Sedgley
Re: World Cup Group D - Uruguay, Costa Rica, England, Italy
I'm obviously biased, but I still think the situations are very different. Mascherano clipped Defoe down from behind and iirc it was the second or third time he was fouled in quick succession, he turns around in frustration and gives him what I think was not a very hard bite. Should have been a red, yes. Should have been a decent ban, sure.
For me, walking over to a player off the ball seemingly without any particular provocation and properly biting is different. Doing so 3 times is outrageous, in a way that I really don't think Defoe's one bite was. Thus much more of an outrage.
Even ignoring the circumstances, doing something like this 3 times is a lot more outrageous than doing so once. I'm quite sure that if Defoe had done so two more times there would have been more of a reaction than to his one time.
I'm obviously biased, but I still think the situations are very different. Mascherano clipped Defoe down from behind and iirc it was the second or third time he was fouled in quick succession, he turns around in frustration and gives him what I think was not a very hard bite. Should have been a red, yes. Should have been a decent ban, sure.
For me, walking over to a player off the ball seemingly without any particular provocation and properly biting is different. Doing so 3 times is outrageous, in a way that I really don't think Defoe's one bite was. Thus much more of an outrage.
Even ignoring the circumstances, doing something like this 3 times is a lot more outrageous than doing so once. I'm quite sure that if Defoe had done so two more times there would have been more of a reaction than to his one time.
