Bedfordspurs
Chris Waddle
I think he would comeSam johnstone is another one out of contract in the summer. Whether he'd come is a different question with lloris signing a new deal. But we have been linked.
He wants a step up
I think he would comeSam johnstone is another one out of contract in the summer. Whether he'd come is a different question with lloris signing a new deal. But we have been linked.
I think he would come
He wants a step up
Disagree with the first bit... Kante runs around all over the place winning battles. Matic is very disciplined in his positioning and allows other players to express themselves. We don't (yet) have a midfield player who has Matic's positional sense IMO.I’d argue kante was that player
He makes average players look very good
PossiblyDisagree with the first bit... Kante runs around all over the place winning battles. Matic is very disciplined in his positioning and allows other players to express themselves. We don't (yet) have a midfield player who has Matic's positional sense IMO.
That Chelsea team has a lot of initiative. Alonso for instance occupies huge amounts of time in the penalty box. Other players pick up the slack automatically. It comes down to proper recruitment first. And It looks like Bentan and Kulu have that independent thinking and tactical awareness we sorely lacked. Enic/Levy needs to continue to back Conte and Paraticii at the next transfer window.Liverpool's midfield was indeed functional, yet i'd still argue that they were as a three superior to Skipp, Wijnks and Hojberg. Put them in the Liverpool system and yes they might up their levels, but still they won't quite match what Liverpool's midfield produced due some missing attributes that they lack. Forgetting of course the fact that Liverpool have two genuinely creative wide attacking forwards in Salah and Mane, its not a like for like comparison, we don't play the same system or with the same type of attackers.
The point with mentioning Hazard is that you can afford a more functional midfield if you have a world class playmaker playing in your forward three who also drops into midfield at times. We don't have a world class attacking forward playmaker, its not quite the same scenario. We also deffo disagree on Matic, considering he started off as an AM you'll notice every now and then he would play a very cute pass, hes better than you are giving him credit for. Add all of these players together and you get a team that has higher quality in midfield as well as more creativity in the attacking three. If we get a Hazard like player than a purely functional midfield has more chance of success, but has been noted multiple times, Conte has never had a midfield that has been purely functional. He has always had a degree of quality and passing quality in there. I expect he will want the same here as that is what has been succesful for him in the past.
No I’m not
What I’m saying is in a conte team the midfield isn’t key
It’s the wing backs and the centre backs doing their jobs (attack wise)
Look at the numbers at Chelsea and inter for goals and assists from his wing backs and compare the attacking contribution from his midfield…
His midfield acts as screen to allow other players to do their job (under lapping centre backs for example).
You can’t compare like for like as it’s different players against different teams. What you can do is see where weaknesses were in teams and how they were addressed by the manager to get the best out of his players.