• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

So, what happened today?

For me there is a much bigger agenda at play here and perhaps the trans community are the first cross section of people to feel the slight change in direction.

The agenda is to do with "positive bias". We know our history came with inequality and inequity but you do not solve it by implementing more of the same but the other way round. If you artificially give these groups the priority then the pendulum swings too far the other way and eventually you're going to get massive push back.

You can pick many examples of where positive bias is in play in our lives. Obviously recruitment in the workplace is one place where it is very prevalent. I'm sure most of us have seen the best candidate get overlooked for a role, seen the HR box get ticked and then see the disenfranchisement of other company employees.

Rightly or wrongly, I actually think you're going to see many more examples of push back on positive bias in this world in the next phase.
 
Silly McSilly Face said:
This isn't really about the risk of abuse (which is very small). It's about women feeling safe when in a "woman only" space or being able to fairly compete in sport against other biological women only.
Click to expand...

The risk of abuse from a trans person I would suggest is miniscule.
The risk of abuse from a man is considerably more.
The risk of abuse from a man exploiting a loop hole in a badly designed law that allows them unrestricted access to a female safe space is not a risk I would be willing to allow to happen to any woman.

And that is the travesty of the whole situation.
By not accepting that there are bad faith actors out there the abusers are being lumped in with trans people and creating a stigma around trans people.
 
ricky2tricky4city said:
Im guessing they are protected by discrimination laws just like other minority groups are BUT the practicalities are different, like the toilet situation...there are thousands of men and women's toilets across the country beyond the workplace...is a third option (fourth as most places have separate disabled facility) possible, everywhere.

And your other example....where do they fit into competitive sport?
Click to expand...
Equalities legislation allows discrimination. You don't have to create a perfect society. Plenty of examples of effective discrimination being tolerated. If you want to be a fire fighter, the requirement to physically be able to lift a dead-weight fully grown adult onto your shoulders and carry them and you safely down a tall ladder will ultimately skew the role towards men. If reasonable adjustments cannot be made, they don't have to be made. An example might be disabled access in an old building.
 
Muttley said:
For me there is a much bigger agenda at play here and perhaps the trans community are the first cross section of people to feel the slight change in direction.

The agenda is to do with "positive bias". We know our history came with inequality and inequity but you do not solve it by implementing more of the same but the other way round. If you artificially give these groups the priority then the pendulum swings too far the other way and eventually you're going to get massive push back.

You can pick many examples of where positive bias is in play in our lives. Obviously recruitment in the workplace is one place where it is very prevalent. I'm sure most of us have seen the best candidate get overlooked for a role, seen the HR box get ticked and then see the disenfranchisement of other company employees.

Rightly or wrongly, I actually think you're going to see many more examples of push back on positive bias in this world in the next phase.
Click to expand...

I find the positive bias in the workplace really badly reported though and also become politically charged. Alot of what I read form those outraged about it online does not reflect the reality. There are some cases where DEI is used to even up the the end of the process, but in the vast majority of examples I see, encouragement of the opportunity and making it clear that people are an equal opportunity employer is not the same as outcome.

Given the civil rights act was only signed in the 60s in America and the Ban on being gay in this country was lifted in 67, its not like this stuff has moved that quickly in reality.
 
Last edited:
Flicking thru Prime last night and the 12yr old daughter wanted to watch Jaws. I was up for it, kind of thing you never get round to ie watching an old classic.

Well, she was still not asleep gone midnight and there were tears in the night. :(
 
LutonSpurs said:
www.theguardian.com

There is so much more for us to worry about than men masquerading as women to access single-sex spaces | Kathryn Bromwich

We should concentrate on what unites us, from sexual assault to healthcare inequality
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com

Maybe look at the data.
Click to expand...

I’m angry about the whole thing, it’s cruel, an entire community is being punished on a hypothetical.

It’s made the world a more dangerous place overnight for Trans people.

We need to be better than this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back