Or we could just get everyone who classes themselves by their religion to fudge off and have a big war somewhere else, and make the area a nice place to live.Civil wars are always the most unpleasant and vindictive, and they can take generations to get over.
I'd be tempted to redraw the map. Get rid of the colonial construct states of British Iraq and French Syria, and create 3 new Sunni, Shiite and Kurd states based on ethnic population distribution.
This is awful. Emotive reportage but still heartbreaking
I have not followed the war in Syria that closely, and I feel a bit guilty that I have let it bypass me - a lot easier than trying to get to grips with the nuances of the politics and the situation in general.
I'm not naive and I know there is not a simple solution. But ffs, in this day and age, it is just outrageous to see people - children - having to endure that level of suffering and be caught in the middle of something they can't influence.
Because we the conservatives didn't have a majority in parliament and needed cross-party support to do so.Why did Obama say he would intervene if they used chemical weapons and then failed to do so. I know the left like to praise him and slag off George W Bush, but it seems to me that the deaths in Syria are now more then Iraq.
Because we the conservatives didn't have a majority in parliament and needed cross-party support to do so.
Labour obviously thought that playing politics is more important than saving lives and blocked it.
I spent time in Syria approx 8 years ago for work, we had two hotels out there and I was promoting them as part of a historical tour package (Lebanon and Syria were in those days high value tours tours)
I often spent 8 days a time travelling from Damascus up to Aleppo taking in all the sites inbetween. Aside from it being one of the most amazing countries in the world it was one of the friendliest in the Middle East that I had visited, it was also very liberal and in some ways western in its views. You could drink as long as it was not within a distance of a mosque and you never felt a threat.
Now I am no political expert but from what I saw back then there was no vibe of unrest or of any real issues with Assad, we had a guide from the University who was elder, he was very open and everyone seemed really happy. I sometimes think that some countries are on a different time than say London, it might be 2016 here but in Syria its not (if that makes sense) and sometimes an Assad is the best for the country than not, at least at that time. Unless there is an exit plan that is for the better of the people from the start it sometimes is better the devil you know.
What's talking brick about trying to save lives?The USA don't care about saving lives, neither do the Russians. The US wants Assad out, the Russians and Iranians want him to stay. With Russian and Iranian support, Assad is going nowhere so, imo, the only thing that can be done is for the US to stop supporting rebel groups and Assad to win the war decisively. When the war is over, negotiate the peace. A horrible qunt wins, but that's just the world. And sometimes, as recent history shows, there are always qunts who are even more horrible waiting in the wings.
@scaramanga you talk a lot of sh1te on this subject and we did it to death in the politics thread iirc.
What's talking bricke about trying to save lives?
There was plenty of opportunity to stop Assad in his tracks, I believe we had a moral obligation to do so.
It's all in the other thread, I can't be bothered to do it all again. You are talking sh1t. I'm out of this discussion.
I'm not a fan of George Osbourne but I think what he says in this debate is quite appropriate. We all know the price of intervening in the Middle East with the Iraq war, and in Syria we are seeing the price of not intervening/
The USA don't care about saving lives, neither do the Russians. The US wants Assad out, the Russians and Iranians want him to stay. With Russian and Iranian support, Assad is going nowhere so, imo, the only thing that can be done is for the US to stop supporting rebel groups and Assad to win the war decisively. When the war is over, negotiate the peace. A horrible qunt wins, but that's just the world. And sometimes, as recent history shows, there are always qunts who are even more horrible waiting in the wings.
@scaramanga you talk a lot of sh1te on this subject and we did it to death in the politics thread iirc.
The USA don't care about saving lives, neither do the Russians. The US wants Assad out, the Russians and Iranians want him to stay. With Russian and Iranian support, Assad is going nowhere so, imo, the only thing that can be done is for the US to stop supporting rebel groups and Assad to win the war decisively. When the war is over, negotiate the peace. A horrible qunt wins, but that's just the world. And sometimes, as recent history shows, there are always qunts who are even more horrible waiting in the wings.
.