Mahrez is a one season wonder
Yep and not the Kane variety of one season wonder either.Mahrez is a one season wonder
Don't those 'tards know how to use per90 stats?Well, Everton fans on GOT are making the point that Burnley are asking for 25m for Keane and *rse are asking for 35m for Oxlade-Chamberlain, both on the last years of their respective contracts - thus, they should at least be getting 30m-odd for Barkley.
I don't think he'll come for 20m, definitely not. Maybe 25m, but that's still half of their publicly stated price. Might well be more. Thus, I'm not sure if that's the route worth going down - spending 25m+ on someone who won't necessarily be a starter straight away. Not to mention wages - Barkley will presumably want 100k a week or thereabouts, which I'm not sure he necessarily deserves yet.
Yeah, but other Everton fans (again, on GOT) are making the point that Barkley outdoes Siggy quite comfortably on several indicators -
View attachment 3331
(Courtesy GOT - https://www.grandoldteam.com/forum/threads/ross-barkley.77981/page-1603#post-5481061 )
If Levy's going to buy a young, English player from another PL club for £20m he'll need to bring a firearm to the negotiations, not just his A game.At the every least he improves our squad which as far as I am concerned means he improves "us". Bearing in mind he is English and his age I could see him costing approx £20m. Anymore I would tell them to jog on. As he only has a year left on his contract Levy will bring his "A" game to the negotiating table
Thought he looked good in their escape from relation season too. Was talked about here as a potential target even back then iirc.Mahrez is a one season wonder
Don't those 'tards know how to use per90 stats?
Still makes Barkley come out better than Sig, but makes him seem far less impressive against the likes of Coutinho.
Those stats seem a strange set of choices too - smells a bit of cherry picking to me.
It's an amateur mistake.Some folks who live for stats do that quite a bit.
It's an amateur mistake.
I doubt those who have an understanding of stats would do so.
You would be surprised, most are agenda driven and those who do not have agenda think they are perfect, those who are neither ( sadly the minority) think they are a tool no more no less.
My thoughts are that Bartley is a bit of a gamble. He has huge talent but applies it a bit inconsistently. Pochettino could turn him into an incredible player, but it certainly isnt guaranteed. If we can get him for only 5 or 10 million too more than we can sell Sissons for thenow it would be worth the gamble IMO. We would instantly be improved with the potential of a very high up side.
If its a straight swap for Sissoko then i would takr Barkley, if not, i wouldn't want him.
Mahrez is the one missing piece of our jigsaw - a playmaker with spark. A dribbler who can create chances and score with very limited space.
In someways I think he can be a bit different from our mould, because he's that x-factor player for the times nothing else is working. This team's van der Vaart.
Re money - if his motivation is his career, he'll join us.
If its a straight swap for Sissoko then i would takr Barkley, if not, i wouldn't want him.
Overall, there are a lot of potential problems with the idea of signing Mahrez. Better to go for a more suitable player, imo.
Overall, there are a lot of potential problems with the idea of signing Mahrez. Better to go for a more suitable player, imo.
Who would you want us to sign realistically?