Not sure Gray as captain makes sense either. Has never established himself at this level to captain a team a PL team.
Now he's deservedly under the microscope. Terrible lineup, terrible subs, terrible result.
He's been backed more than any manager in Spurs history. He has to demonstrate that he's worth it, and boy has he started off poorly.
What would you have done subs-wise?
3 out of our 4 main CB's are absolutely useless in the air. It will almost certainly haunt us all season.Put Danso on and switched to a back three with Fernandes and Tonali in the pivot, Tel and Rich up top, Maddison in behind. Throw on Solanke for Tel at the 60' mark if we need even more physical presence.
Danso on means we possibly don't concede that silly third, or look so weak defending headers all game long. Rich and Solanke up top should win a few. It's all about winning the physical battles vs Brentford.
Put Danso on and switched to a back three with Fernandes and Tonali in the pivot, Tel and Rich up top, Maddison in behind. Throw on Solanke for Tel at the 60' mark if we need even more physical presence.
Danso on means we possibly don't concede that silly third, or look so weak defending headers all game long. Rich and Solanke up top should win a few. It's all about winning the physical battles vs Brentford.
Got it.
I personally think with the lack of endeavor, had he gone to a back three it'd have been even worse but I get what you're saying...
That we are in a place where people are suggesting we need to start Danso is worrying. He's a good player. We should be expecting better. RDZ wants passers back there, but can those passers defend?
Got it.
I personally think with the lack of endeavor, had he gone to a back three it'd have been even worse but I get what you're saying...
That we are in a place where people are suggesting we need to start Danso is worrying. He's a good player. We should be expecting better. RDZ wants passers back there, but can those passers defend?
Yeah, I hear you mate. Personally it's been a worry with me for a while now. Think we lack physicality across that backline, and it will hurt us this season unless VdV somehow learns to win a header every now and then.Got it.
I personally think with the lack of endeavor, had he gone to a back three it'd have been even worse but I get what you're saying...
That we are in a place where people are suggesting we need to start Danso is worrying. He's a good player. We should be expecting better. RDZ wants passers back there, but can those passers defend?
It's a balance thing, Senesi is left sided, both Danso and JPVH are right sided, Danso can play either side but he's definetly stronger on the right.He should be starting on merit. There's no reason for Senesi to start over him. He's proven himself as our best defender and playing him keeps some sort of continuity in a back line that was brand new.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.