• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Richarlison

There’s about as much chance of someone paying £40m for Richarlison this window as there was of Barcelona paying Everton €100m for him back in his prime; after he scored 13 PL goals in consecutive seasons for them.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Ace Face said:
Not too many consistent 12-15 goals per season strikers out there, despite his recent injury woes.
Click to expand...

This, usual player x is either WC or absolute trash narrative.

Richarlison is at worst a mid-table PL striker if he can stay fit. Yes, he's injuries have affected his athleticism but those 12-15 goals for a lot of sides (and him playing 1 game a week in a non Europe side would help) would easily be worth 40M to a club (not saying we would get that, but 15M is laughable)
 
Raziel said:
This, usual player x is either WC or absolute trash narrative.

Richarlison is at worst a mid-table PL striker if he can stay fit. Yes, he's injuries have affected his athleticism but those 12-15 goals for a lot of sides (and him playing 1 game a week in a non Europe side would help) would easily be worth 40M to a club (not saying we would get that, but 15M is laughable)
Click to expand...

Mid table at worst, no - i don't think the likes of Bournemouth Brighton or Brentford would consider him for a transfer target. He'd be a target for a team that needs goals and sees little enough of the ball in the opponents half that they wouldn't be concerned with his all round play. A promoted side/lower half team basically.
 
billyiddo said:
Mid table at worst, no - i don't think the likes of Bournemouth Brighton or Brentford would consider him for a transfer target. He'd be a target for a team that needs goals and sees little enough of the ball in the opponents half that they wouldn't be concerned with his all round play. A promoted side/lower half team basically.
Click to expand...

Everton have (supposedly enquired), Fulham would. Forest would, I think you vastly overestimate how many strikers have 5 seasons with double figures in goals in PL.

Don't disagree in certain system type setups he wouldn't be applicable
 
Raziel said:
This, usual player x is either WC or absolute trash narrative.

Richarlison is at worst a mid-table PL striker if he can stay fit. Yes, he's injuries have affected his athleticism but those 12-15 goals for a lot of sides (and him playing 1 game a week in a non Europe side would help) would easily be worth 40M to a club (not saying we would get that, but 15M is laughable)
Click to expand...

The key is that he will be that for a team who plays a style of football which suits him. Everton, Sunderland, Arsenal 😂

A team that wants to dominate the ball like we do, he is a major hinderence.
 
robp135 said:
That would make me take £8M lol.

I don’t dispute that Richarlison can get goals. But I also want to be entertained. Id give up those goals to play a more entertaining style of football.
Click to expand...

lol - anyone would think that you don't rate him.

I think Richi joins a club with Udogie, Sarr and Bergvall that leave for the right offer. Eventually, RDZ shuts the club down as we won't have time to churn another player in the other direction. Then our manager will declare undying love for these players.
 
Raziel said:
This, usual player x is either WC or absolute trash narrative.

Richarlison is at worst a mid-table PL striker if he can stay fit. Yes, he's injuries have affected his athleticism but those 12-15 goals for a lot of sides (and him playing 1 game a week in a non Europe side would help) would easily be worth 40M to a club (not saying we would get that, but 15M is laughable)
Click to expand...
He's not a 12-15 goal striker. He's literally never scored more than 13 and he's only hit 13 twice. He's actually a 10-13 goal striker if you're lucky.

He's more likely to get his stock 10-11 based on his scoring record.
 
robp135 said:
That would make me take £8M lol.

I don’t dispute that Richarlison can get goals. But I also want to be entertained. Id give up those goals to play a more entertaining style of football.
Click to expand...
If he can stay fit (massive if) I'd keep him - he's a really useful bench option.
Can come on and nick a goal, will work hard and defend from the front - those are good attributes for the end of games
 
Bishop said:
He's not a 12-15 goal striker. He's literally never scored more than 13 and he's only hit 13 twice. He's actually a 10-13 goal striker if you're lucky.

He's more likely to get his stock 10-11 based on his scoring record.
Click to expand...

Perhaps we can P/X him for this European Golden Boot winner who’s averaged in excess of 30 goals per season over the past decade plus is apparently somewhat of a Tottenham fan…

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back