• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Richarlison

MKSpur said:
Incredible that he was allowed to play a further 5 games for his club, score a goal in two separate 3-2 wins, which in effect was the difference in keeping them up, a further 44 days later the decision to ban him for his new club is made, 2 months after the initial defence. sexy
Click to expand...

Whoever makes these decisions took about two decades to ban Dier for that incident in the stands, so I can't say I'm surprised.

Doesn't make it any less ridiculous, of course. There should've been a meeting the day after the game to decide on a possible ban for the flare episode. It really is that simple. Not that I expect that kind of efficiency from whoever high paid macarons are in charge of this, though.
 
Poch used to ease new players in didn't he, so no bad thing really. Should get Richarlison more pumped for his debut.
 
SpurMeUp said:
Poch used to ease new players in didn't he, so no bad thing really. Should get Richarlison more pumped for his debut.
Click to expand...

If we can't survive one game without him we're fudged. If we are loaning gil or parrott, could keep them for the game.

Meh.
 
SpurMeUp said:
Poch used to ease new players in didn't he, so no bad thing really. Should get Richarlison more pumped for his debut.
Click to expand...

Good point, next game is Chelsea isn't it? We could do with a player with a bit of motivation and a point to prove when we play that lot.
 
Lost Mango said:
Given how well Bentacur and Kulu did going straight in not convinced the 18 month settling in period Poch went with was necessary
Click to expand...

Think it may have been more necessary under Pochettino than under Conte.

Conte seems excellent at quickly getting the players integrated into his style of play. Perhaps Pochettino's style of high pressing and high line defending was more difficult to get right - and the consequences of getting it wrong are often large.

Defensively at least Conte's style seems easier to get into. Attacking side, outside of counter attacking, took more time here at least. Definitely demanding and even difficult to get right, but still he made relatively quick work of it.
 
braineclipse said:
Think it may have been more necessary under Pochettino than under Conte.

Conte seems excellent at quickly getting the players integrated into his style of play. Perhaps Pochettino's style of high pressing and high line defending was more difficult to get right - and the consequences of getting it wrong are often large.

Defensively at least Conte's style seems easier to get into. Attacking side, outside of counter attacking, took more time here at least. Definitely demanding and even difficult to get right, but still he made relatively quick work of it.
Click to expand...
No nonsense.
 
Surprised he doesn't speak English well enough to do an interview, after how many years (3 or 4?) here.
But pleased with his ambition, really hope it works out well for him.
 
lurker of old said:
Surprised he doesn't speak English well enough to do an interview, after how many years (3 or 4?) here.
But pleased with his ambition, really hope it works out well for him.
Click to expand...
He does speak pretty good broken English
Maybe at first like Poch he doesn't want to be misquoted so speaks in his native tongue
 
jlu1lvvr41b91.jpg


What do you call this attitude [emoji6]

Sent from my SM-T865 using Fapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back