We really shouldn't be looking to go back to a DoF again, it was a disaster last time and would be again. The problem is that the manager is ultimately responsible for the way the team plays but he's not responsible for bringing in the players, so he's going to blame the quality of players and the DoF blames the manager. At least with a manager he identifies the players and then if they don't perform he's got nobody to blame but himself.
I see. To me, this always ends up in tears as at some point the manager and the Dof wont agree over a players potential or whether hed fit in the formation.
Then you have the chairman who listens to one more than the other and the problems starts. I dont think it is very good for harmony, unless you have two guys who always agree, which is i believe really rare.
is Levy panicking because he is scared of missing out on an AVB, Martinez or Rodgers:-k
^ interesting to look at Arsenals relative lack of success since Dein has left as wellNayims post
you may or may not be aware that Daniel Levy's wife is very ill and he may wish to have a structure in place that allows him more time
yeah those are the possible problems - way i see it, DoF is a long term position and should be relatively behind the scenes - the way we have gone about it in the past gives the DoF too much limelight therefore people think there is more of a problem than there actually is - all the reasons you can give for a manager falling foul of a DoF are as possible to happen with any other high rank staff member or even the chairman himself - what would happen if Levy thinks that redknapp isn't getting the best out of the players ? he'll sack him right ? what happens if Levy doesn't like the transfer targets that Redknapp puts forward ? he'll tell him that aren't viable etc etc
I know I am going to get slaughtered for this but a forum is here to share information.
Have had it on good authority that there is a compensation package on the table from Spurs in return for the departure of Mr Redknapp, apparently it is small in financial terms however Spurs are keen to bring in a new boss.
I will be honest now, if it does not come off it does not come off, I wont make any excuse as I won't know the reason that he takes it or not.
There is a HUGE difference in claiming to be ITK and sharing a peice of information you have been given in good faith by someone you have no reason to doubt.
Careful mate, you'll get slaughtered by some here...I did when I dared to suggest something I knew...you're best off going back into the shadows and letting it play out mate...
is Levy panicking because he is scared of missing out on an AVB, Martinez or Rodgers:-k
Levy does not panic. He has had plans in place for a while now...anyone who doubts that he will be strong at this CRITICAL time in our history has not paid any attention to the way he's operated. have some faith in the man. BTW, looking forward to another "Pinocchio" dingy and more ridicule myself...
From what I've seen it's another cook, another political power player and an increased chance in disharmony at the top!! The only time it seems to function is when the DoF has hired the Manager and that Manager was his choice.
you may or may not be aware that Daniel Levy's wife is very ill and he may wish to have a structure in place that allows him more time
parklane1
Well Redknapp has history of walking out on clubs, if Levy is going to go back to a DOF it will be no surprise if he walks again.
Maybe, if we had an ITK thread it would be viable.
That way it would be easy enough to go back and see how much that person had been right/wrong and make judgements from that.
no, im sure Levy is not one to generally panic, and im sure he is good at contingency plans, but i do feel his hand maybe being forced a bit by the fact that Liverpool sacked Dalglish and FSG seem to be going after one or two of Levy's ideal men for the Tottenham job
So in fact, you need two calm guys. Leonardo and Ancelotti at PSG are not fighting yet but they havent won the title. If you have a dof or a manager with a bit too much character, then its trouble.