• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Rathering intereting news story i thought some of you should read

Danishfurniturelover

the prettiest spice girl
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/10375358/True-scale-of-European-immigration.html

The report coming from the EU itself, you know my father always used to tell me that a true man never needed to say i told you so to people who lied to him.

Guess im not a real man because im going to say i told you so to the lefties on here. I just do not understand the hatred and lies that left continue to tell when the truth is staring them in the face. Life is starting to look a little better now, economy doing better under the tories plan a rather then the lefts plan b which would have resulted in us borrowing more money.

Anyway im off to do a i told you so dance, have a nice day ladies.
 
In the words of top northern folk band half a sixpence who were on Phoenix Nights, send the buggers back

More than 600,000 unemployed European Union migrants are living in Britain at a cost of £1.5 billion to the NHS alone, according to an EU report
 
This pleases me immensely too !!!

The Sunday Telegraph can disclose that he is to bring a court case to make it easier for European migrants to claim benefits in Britain.

He will challenge a scheme that makes certain benefits available only to migrants from the EU who are “economically active” and is intended to make Britain less attractive to so-called benefit tourists
 
Is a bit of a vague article really, they seem to stick to the words 'unemployed' and 'non-active' rather than actually try and tell you who they are..

If we've taken in 400k male working immigrants and they have each bought a non-working wife and child than the increase is hardly surprising.


Would need to open up the numbers to get a true representation of these unemployed people, rather than what seems like a rather sensationalist article.
 
Last edited:
Nontheless that ia still an additional person out of work claiming benefits until they can claim their 100k Right to buy discount whilst others struggle to save for reasonable deposit on a house.
 
Benefits? How do you know they are claiming benefits?


The article in question makes no mention of any benefits, it only talks about costs that the nhs undergoes.
 
Hhhhhhmmmm interesting, I guess you can do that when you're the largest economy in the World (about $1.5tril larger than the US)

By the why, it was pretty much us who invented open borders for the Empire. Also, in all honesty can you two find a better why to channel your anger and just **** off?
 
Hhhhhhmmmm interesting, I guess you can do that when you're the largest economy in the World (about $1.5tril larger than the US)

By the why, it was pretty much us who invented open borders for the Empire. Also, in all honesty can you two find a better why to channel your anger and just **** off?

Nope not anger it is about public finances and is a political thread no need for the swearing is the, i and other have mentioned this several times as a way we in this country need to keep control of our finances or risk things like the NHS going bust. Now we have EU reports saying the same thing.

I will report your post as i found it offensive being told to **** off or telling anyone on this board to **** off is i believe seen as wrong but i will leave it to the mods to deal with it if they will.
 
acer-bonsai-pall.jpg
 
Benefits? How do you know they are claiming benefits?


The article in question makes no mention of any benefits, it only talks about costs that the nhs undergoes.

So you dont consider the use of the NHS a benefit? Those who work pay for it
 
So you dont consider the use of the NHS a benefit? Those who work pay for it

They shouldnt come over and be able to use the NHS straight away, earn yuor keep first then fine no issue, come here to sponge, well **** back off to where you come from
 
So you dont consider the use of the NHS a benefit? Those who work pay for it


Not entirely no, it's a slightly different concept.


Anyway, so a migrant husband works and pays for it and his 'non-active' wife should not be able to go on the NHS?


There is pathetically little information about who these 'non-active' people are.
 
Not entirely no, it's a slightly different concept.


Anyway, so a migrant husband works and pays for it and his 'non-active' wife should not be able to go on the NHS?


There is pathetically little information about who these 'non-active' people are.

Well I think you need to look up the term benefit before you post in this thread again mate. Its this 'bean bag' sitting and wishy washy attitude that leads to benefit tourism, and we all end up losing out.
 
All the things people have been asking for like the problem of NHS tourism will be sorted as close to the general election as David Cameron dare leave it.
 
Hoo boy, the comments below that article are a gold mine.

"We are being taken for mugs by the political class while they move to eradicate the English, Welsh, Scottish and Irish gene pool with mass immigration and multiculturalism.

Stop paying your Taxes people, bring the LibLabCon government to it`s knees."

"Is it any wonder when we are shackled to all of those lame EU economies?"

"The question is whether the English people want non-white populations domiciled in England. Let us be asked, and if the answer is no, then they leave. The race-replacement of a people is a genocide if that people are prevented from defending their existence and their birthright, either through the political process or through civil action.The deliberate replacement by endless minoritisation of a people against its will by government diktat is a genocide under the terms of the Convention."

"Why is it only non-European immigrants seem to take great delight with the idea of us becoming a minority in our own homelands? It's only with the non-Marxist Europeans that I've spoken to where I find any sense of empathy for our plight. I find it most unusual to see how ungracious guests can show such open hostility toward their host immense generosity."

"Our problem is not with authentic (north) EU immigrants which are the smallest lot of all immigrants and tend to be highly educated and skilled. Our problems is with the enormous volume non-EU immigrants, asylum seekers and the criminalized and corrupt southern and eastern EU member states who have been permitted open border policies, and hand out residency to anyone (Muslim, Asian, African) who enter their country. Not to mention the problem called Brussels who don't permit southern countries to just shoot illegals who force their way in even after warnings. Yes, they SHOULD be allowed to shoot them."

""The Telegraph: “…50% of Muslim men and 75% of Muslim women are unemployed“.
October 10, 2010 in the article titled: "Britain's coping classes at breaking point".
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...

I know your difficulty because if you actually try and find these figures from the government, the links are magically dead to any statistics that include musrats."

And that's just the first page of comments. There are 68 more. And if just the first page starts out with a few somewhat legitimate comments (namely the one on the EU, even if I wouldn't exactly call two countries with higher GDPs than the UK (Germany and France) 'lame economies') and ends in such delightful displays of intelligence, 'musrats' and all....I shudder to think what I'll find on page 69. Most of those comments also add 'Vote UKIP!' to the bottom, with one particularly enlightening comment calling for 'putting love back into your hearts' by voting UKIP, presumably the same love that manifests itself as diatribes against 'musrats' and race extermination further down.

I will not wade into puerile debates, but I'd like to leave a few facts here:

The UK is 86 percent white, comprised of 80.5 percent of people who consider themselves 'white British' and 5.5 percent who consider themselves 'white other' (presumably mainly those delightful Northern European immigrants). (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20677321)

95 percent of the UK is monolingual, speaking only English. That's nineteen out of twenty people, on average, who can only speak English, and I'd wager a significant chunk of the remainder can speak more than one language while still remaining fluent in English. (http://www.bbc.co.uk/languages/european_languages/countries/uk.shtml)

Atheism is a much faster-growing sector, religion-wise, than Islam. (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20677321)

Moving on to immigrants, (who, after all this 'unparalleled' rush to grab British jobs and benefits, still make up only about 14.5 percent of the working population) a little above 70 percent of those entering the country find employment, with those originating from India and Africa (presumably two of the bones of contention) averaging 65-70 percent employment rates. Hardly a sponge of epic proportions, especially when considering that a large proportion of 'working-age' immigrants are likely to be non-working spouses or people trying to finish up higher education before entering the job market. (http://byline.timetric.com/2010/10/07/immigrant-employment-in-the-uk/)

And immigrants, on average, are less likely to be in social housing than people born in the UK, even when the immigrant is from a developing country. (http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/pa014.pdf)

Long story short, please do debate the validity of NHS tourism and the abuse of the benefits system all you want. They're certainly sensible topics to talk about, even if I don't really see the point in doing so when you break down the numbers and examine what percentage of the UK's population and short-term visitors actually indulge in either. But don't claim that the poor ickle white population in the UK is being subjected to 'genocide', or that 'musrats' are rapidly taking over the UK in their quest to live indolent lives and impose Sharia law, or that no one speaks English anymore. I'm sure 99 percent of the people on this forum don't do that, but it seems a large proportion of UKIP's delightful support base derives from exploiting these very falsehoods to engineer a ludicrously demented (and quite possibly significantly evil) narrative on the perils of Britain today. And that needs to be fought, tooth and nail, especially when it moves from the pages of tabloids like the Mail into the comments of even stuffy establishment papers like the Telegraph.
 
The UK is 86 percent white, comprised of 80.5 percent of people who consider themselves 'white British' and 5.5 percent who consider themselves 'white other' (presumably mainly those delightful Northern European immigrants). (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20677321)

And in 20 years where do you think that stat will be? I think most people at the minute think the problem is not what has happened now, but what is happening in the future. Its clear you think everyone is bonkers as the above statistics you decided best fit that argument. But the numbers are headed in only one direction.

I went to my GP the other day my normal guy was away and had this other guy, **** I had to get him to talk slowly and repeat himself 3 times so I could understand what the fcuk he was saying in English. He also had to go to a fricken book to find a solution to what I was telling/showing him, (I had been bitten by something and had an allergic reaction and was worried it was one of those spider fcukers) The guy was about 50 so not a young'un finding his way... and you know what he prescribed me... fcuking Scabies cream. Can you ****ing believe that. Yes I reported him.
 
Last edited:
Well I think you need to look up the term benefit before you post in this thread again mate. Its this 'bean bag' sitting and wishy washy attitude that leads to benefit tourism, and we all end up losing out.


Not really, I would go with healthcare being a right, rather than a benefit. But that's not the point in this particular thread.
 
Back