• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Politics, politics, politics

Gerry Adams and Ayatollah Khamenei

I'm an Irish nationalist, but I've always said it would stick in my throat if those with blood on their hands like McGuinness and Adams were still around to see reunification happen (1 down, 1 to go)

And Iran is a brilliant country with great people, and a decent president in Rouhani, but the ayatollah is an evil brick who has the whole country under his heal

Trump is too incompetent to worry about - there are far worse Republicans. And Putin's power will quickly collapse as green energy replaces fossil fuels

Have been thinking about Mercer and Renaissance Technologies. With a conspiracy theory hat on, Mercer's funding appears consistent with Russian aims - pro Trump, populism, disruptive as well as funding global warming deniers. Russia being so dependent on selling oil and gas Mercer's funding appears aligned with the Kremlin. And why would Mercer a mathematician and scientist, a man with a PHD want to deny global warming is occuring? Seems odd right?

On top of that Renaissance Technologies has a completely hidden investment fund which only employees can invest in. This fund makes the most money. It makes exceptional amounts. Consistently. While their other funds don't always make exceptional amounts (although these opento investor funds are highly successful there are years where they make nothing while the hidden fund makes massive gains). How these funds work is a complete mystery. Apparently they use Quarks - software that picks up on trends. Why has no one else been able to replicate it?

So far so compelling. Some claim the Renaissance Tech funds are used to launder money for Russia using high speed transactions to hide the scam. But enter James Simons. A gifted Jewish mathematician, he founded Renaissance Tech and hired the scientists, programmers, physicists etc who make up the firm. He's a Democrat who funds them generously and a philanthropist. He also had a clear vision for Renaissance Tech and a rationale - by using scientists and not traders to understand patterns etc. they do things differently. In short he's not an obvious Banks type that you could so easily identify as an agent of Russian intervention. But he retired from Renaissance Tech some years ago, and Mercer runs the more successful than ever Renaissance Tech funds now, presumably with Simons blessing.

Where does that leave us? It would be astounding if Renaissance Tech was a vechnicle for Russian laundering and lobbying of US politics. But not impossible. Something about Renaissance Tech doesn't quite add up. Why are others not poaching the brains and replicating it? How are they so far and above the most successful venture capital firms out there, consistently delivering massive gains? 'Its science' just seems too cute and easy. If it were so easy others would be doing it too.

On balance, my guess is Renaissance Tech is probably legit. It's unique methods for predicting markets and placing high speed trades have probably been at the forefront of fiance trading and invention. ...at least in the past. Markets have a funny way of catching up. Other people pick up on trends or new methods to make money, and I am not so sure Renaissance Tech could so seamlessly stay ahead of game year in and year out. With Simon's out the way, could Mercer have invented a new way to keep profits soaring, involving Russian money? Anything is possible. Simons worked for the US government before being sacked, and who knows, maybe he is even in on something. The likelihood of this being true is not high. There is scant (if any) evidence for it. But what a story it would be if it turned out to be true. There are certainly some mysteries to Renaissance Tech, and when things appear too good to be true, they sometimes are.
 
Last edited:
Have been thinking about Mercer and Renaissance Technologies. With a conspiracy theory hat on, Mercer's funding appears consistent with Russian aims - pro Trump, populism, disruptive as well as funding global warming deniers. Russia being so dependent on selling oil and gas Mercer's funding appears aligned with the Kremlin. And why would Mercer a mathematician and scientist, a man with a PHD want to deny global warming is occuring? Seems odd right?

On top of that Renaissance Technologies has a completely hidden investment fund which only employees can invest in. This fund makes the most money. It makes exceptional amounts. Consistently. While their other funds don't always make exceptional amounts (although these opento investor funds are highly successful there are years where they make nothing while the hidden fund makes massive gains). How these funds work is a complete mystery. Apparently they use Quarks - software that picks up on trends. Why has no one else been able to replicate it?

So far so compelling. Some claim the Renaissance Tech funds are used to launder money for Russian. But then enter James Simons. A gifted Jewish mathematician, he founded Renaissance Tech and hired the scientists, programmers, physicists etc who make up Renaissance Tech. He's a Democrat who funds them generously and a philanthropist. He also had a clear vision for Renaissance Tech for how it makes billions - by using science and not traders to understand patterns etc. In short he's not an obvious Banks type that you could so easily identify as an agent of Russian intervention. But he retired from Renaissance Tech some years ago, and Mercer runs the funds, presumably with Simons blessing.

Where does that leave us? It would be astounding if Renaissance Tech was a vechnicle for Russian laundering and lobbying of US politics. But not impossible. Something about Renaissance Tech doesn't quite add up. Why are others not taking the brains and replicating it? How are they so far and above the most success venture capital firms out there, consistently delivering massive gains? 'Its science' just seems too cute and easy. If it were others would be doing it too.

On balance, my guess is Renaissance Tech is probably legit. It's unique methods for predicting markets and placing high speed trades have probably been at the forefront of fiance trading and invention. At least in the past. But markets have a funny way of catching up. Other people pick up on trends, or new methods to make money, and I am not so sure they could so seamlessly stay ahead of game year in and year out. With Simon's out the way, could Mercer have invented a new way to keep profits spiraling, involving Russian funds? Anything is possible. Simons worked for the US government before being sacked, and who knows, maybe he even is in on something. The likelihood of this being true is not high! There is scant (if any) evidence for it. But what a story it would be if it turned out to be true. There are certainly some mysteries to Renaissance Tech, and when things appear too good to be true, they sometimes are.
I love a good conspiracy theory. I must read about these guys a bit more.
 
I sort of agree, but there must be some pluses or you'd think the Norwegians (as in their populace) would be wanting to join the EU.
Have you seen the size of their sovereign wealth fund.
The Norwegian s don't want for much, and they certainly don't need the (full on) EU.
 
Five Star are greens. It's their minor coalition partners who are the facists

Yeah, I was the one who pointed that fact out to you, so i don't need this gratuitous advice. You said that getting into bed with fascists was a price that you were prepared to accept, or WTTE. Hence my fairies at the bottom of the garden label. Anyone who advocates cooperation with fascists has zero credibility.
 
You don't want to make martyrs out of people like that. Imagine a Paul Ryan or Sarah Palin coming in in that context. A more fitting end for Trump would be doing an Elvis and dying alone having a brick
Yeah, just look at JFK, the James Dean of politics, assignation was a good career move.
 
Yeah, I was the one who pointed that fact out to you, so i don't need this gratuitous advice. You said that getting into bed with fascists was a price that you were prepared to accept, or WTTE. Hence my fairies at the bottom of the garden label. Anyone who advocates cooperation with fascists has zero credibility.

what about cooperation with the other end of the extremist spectrum?
 
Have you seen the size of their sovereign wealth fund.
The Norwegian s don't want for much, and they certainly don't need the (full on) EU.

What I'm saying is, their country is happy being a "rule-taker without having a say/vassal state/blah blah." They are not only happy out of the full-EU, but they are happy with this halfway-house scenario with the EEA that everyone says is so terrible.
 
What I'm saying is, their country is happy being a "rule-taker without having a say/vassal state/blah blah." They are not only happy out of the full-EU, but they are happy with this halfway-house scenario with the EEA that everyone says is so terrible.

It suits their specific situation though. Like Switzerland they are much richer than the EU average, and have limited agriculture, so would end up huge net contributors. The Common Fisheries Policy would also decimate a big part of their industry
 
It suits their specific situation though. Like Switzerland they are much richer than the EU average, and have limited agriculture, so would end up huge net contributors. The Common Fisheries Policy would also decimate a big part of their industry

I don't disagree. I am just saying that they are happy being part of the EEA, they don't seem to have a population that is agitating to leave the EEA and go to WTO rules. So it can't be all bad.
 
I don't disagree. I am just saying that they are happy being part of the EEA, they don't seem to have a population that is agitating to leave the EEA and go to WTO rules. So it can't be all bad.

There's a bit of history with EFTA though isn't there. It was originally setup by the UK and Scandinavia as a rival to the EEC. Since the UK, Sweden and Denmark left, they've taken leadership of it and it's kind of their thing

Norway has such riches (green energy and food self-sufficiency, then oil to flog as a 'cash crop'), but are also a small country (population 1/12 of the UK), it probably doesn't make much difference to them either way really.

Regulatory alignment presumably isn't a big issue for oil and fish?
 
There's a bit of history with EFTA though isn't there. It was originally setup by the UK and Scandinavia as a rival to the EEC. Since the UK, Sweden and Denmark left, they've taken leadership of it and it's kind of their thing

Norway has such riches (green energy and food self-sufficiency, then oil to flog as a 'cash crop'), but are also a small country (population 1/12 of the UK), it probably doesn't make much difference to them either way really.

Regulatory alignment presumably isn't a big issue for oil and fish?

During the referendum campaign, it was the remain side who were saying these things i.e. "EEA is fine for Norway but not for us." Many prominent figures on the Leave side were saying "we could be like Norway, wouldn't that be nice?"

Funny how things change.
 
"Controlling immigration" and "access to free trade" are both slogans that you could define and interpret in any way you wanted, so if the nice man from Orb rang me up and asked which was more important I'd tell him to tinkle off. Still, to the extent that it's a meaningful picture of how voters react over time, bodes well.
 
Back