Makes a lot of sense
Makes a lot of sense
That why you start by massively reforming the schools asap, so they start coming into the workplace next decade. It's what the Finns did in the 70s and early 80s.
That chap says the government could impose a 5 year wait for immigrants before being eligible for NHS, welfare benefits, income tax breaks.This article is interesting on this point
That chap says the government could impose a 5 year wait for immigrants before being eligible for NHS, welfare benefits, income tax breaks.
Sounds good.
That chap says the government could impose a 5 year wait for immigrants before being eligible for NHS, welfare benefits, income tax breaks.
Sounds good.
Or, to paraphrase Amber Rudd, "Nobody gives a fudge"
Or more succinctly everyone knows the Police were Thatcher's private army to break the unions, they lied and broke the law routinely by design not accident. Whats the point in spending £m on something we all know anyway.Or, to paraphrase Amber Rudd, "Nobody gives a fudge"
Good for them.Or more succinctly everyone knows the Police were Thatcher's private army to break the unions, they lied and broke the law routinely by design not accident. Whats the point in spending £m on something we all know anyway.
Good for them.
It was either the police or the real army - they're lucky it was the police. Imagine the damage the army would have done.
Or, to paraphrase Amber Rudd, "Nobody gives a fudge"
1) I doubt we'll agree on this one either, but for me it had to be done. "Workers" and I do use the term in its very loosest sense, were using brute force and physical intimidation to fudge things up for everyone else. That cannot be allowed to happen.1). it was not the police or the army, these were not the only choices.
2). I know you are a bit laissez faire on police force obeying while enforcing the law but this would be a priority for me. Not going to get to involved in the rights and wrongs of this as we will never agree.
With regards to a cover up / need for a review I agree these is no reason to do this as it is accepted by all that the police force acted unlawfully but some think it was justified. If you are having a review then it should be on the lawfulness of the government for instructing these policies and this is not on the cards.
It wasn't about revenge, it was about allowing the country to develop and progress, not being held to ransom by a few greedy, workshy tossers.Using your own way of saying things only fudgeing tools do not care about a cover up against the workers by a goverment who were determined to get their own back after seeing Heath lose.
It wasn't about revenge, it was about allowing the country to develop and progress, not being held to ransom by a few greedy, workshy tossers.
1) I doubt we'll agree on this one either, but for me it had to be done. "Workers" and I do use the term in its very loosest sense, were using brute force and physical intimidation to fudge things up for everyone else. That cannot be allowed to happen.
1a) I don't believe there ever could have been an agreement that ended strikes that didn't involve the government propping up dying industries.
2) I'm sure we won't agree there either. For me the fault is in those who use bullying and intimidation in the first place. Doing so puts the blame squarely on their shoulders, not of the police.
For example the minimum wage in Romania is equivalent to £1.50 an hour. Are you really suggesting the same rate should apply to Brits and romanian immigrants in the UK? it will have to apply to natives as well as immigrants as part of being part of the single market.The government also has to do its part to ensure that the rate is something reasonable. The best way to do that is to reduce incentives - make the minimum wage and the level of in-work benefits closer to that of the rest of the EU and immigration will reduce accordingly.
I don't think there's a realistic alternative.in reply to 2). I don't want those who are enforcing the law to break the law, almost ever, they have rules of engagement that we as a society have decided they should abide. If the other side decide to break the law they go to prison, same should be for the police. Or change the law to reflect that the police have absolute retaliatory powers Judge Dred style. Don't have laws that pretend we are civilized while condoning / encouraging the opposite.
Nail. Head.For example the minimum wage in Romania is equivalent to £1.50 an hour. Are you really suggesting the same rate should apply to Brits and romanian immigrants in the UK? it will have to apply to natives as well as immigrants as part of being part of the single market.
Actually i think I already know the answer because I'm sure you don't believe there should be a minimum wage anyway.
"As at football matches, the way to move a large, hostile crowd is on horseback - I don't think there's a better alternative that anyone has found."I don't think there's a realistic alternative.
Yes, the proper action would have been to individually arrest each of those on the strikes, but that couldn't be done. As at football matches, the way to move a large, hostile crowd is on horseback - I don't think there's a better alternative that anyone has found.
Personally I think CS and water cannon would have done the job without having to risk the safety of the police, but I'm no expert in police tactics.
Nail. Head.