Oh the old false equivalence line, they are all the same, so we may as well vote Tory anyway.
Lol. I've never voted tory in my life. I just want a competent government to vote for.
Oh the old false equivalence line, they are all the same, so we may as well vote Tory anyway.
They're the ones in the top right.The right wing nut job fringe.
They're the ones in the top right.
I'm only economically right wing.
They're the ones in the top right.
I'm only economically right wing.
Can you not see the inherent flaw in capitalism? That the winner takes all, means the winner takes all. There will be no middle class just the ultra rich and the rest of us.
The socialist approach is just as bad. Equal opportunities, but equal outcomes. No reward for working hard or being gifted. No motivation. Stagnation.
There has to be middle ground.
Spoken like a true Marxist nutjob.True, but that is the thing that counts in the end. Wanting to protect whales but also advocating for the privatization of the NHS does not make one a moderate in my book, it makes one a right wing nut job just the same
Socialism is about equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome. Socialism is decent health care for your kids, a school for them to get an education, universities for them to develop their intellect, a police service to keep them safe. Yeah socialism is terrible. Please get it right.
That's because everyone (successful) is naturally selfish.That may well be what socialism is, but no one has ever got near to actually doing it.
I am the middle ground.Can you not see the inherent flaw in capitalism? That the winner takes all, means the winner takes all. There will be no middle class just the ultra rich and the rest of us.
The socialist approach is just as bad. Equal opportunities, but equal outcomes. No reward for working hard or being gifted. No motivation. Stagnation.
There has to be middle ground.
Socialism is about equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome. Socialism is decent health care for your kids, a school for them to get an education, universities for them to develop their intellect, a police service to keep them safe. Yeah socialism is terrible. Please get it right.
Socialism and communism are not the same thing, nor indeed is social democracy.So social democratic coutries don't have healthcare for their kids? Schools, universities or a police service?
Would you really prefer to live in a communist country than one using the nordic model?
If you haven't noticed the world is already in a sorry place because we have not limited our consumption to our needs. I would also disagree with your assertion that everyone is naturally selfish. On the contrary, I have found most people to be decent and kind.That's because everyone (successful) is naturally selfish.
Those who believe in that "To each according to his needs" crap usually end up as union types. Anyone who has employed people will tell you that they're utterly useless for anything other than causing trouble. The world would be in a sorry place (East Germany) if we all believed that brick.
Indeed…. Though it is also destroying the only world that we have to inhabit.I am the middle ground.
Socially liberal with a view on economics that actually works. It's pretty hard to look at the last couple of centuries and suggest that capitalism hasn't improved life for the vast majority.
The two are not exclusive.If you haven't noticed the world is already in a sorry place because we have not limited our consumption to our needs. I would also disagree with your assertion that everyone is naturally selfish. On the contrary, I have found most people to be decent and kind.
The same as with most other walks of life. That governments should begin with an aim of doing nothing and then do the very minimum that is absolutely necessary.Indeed…. Though it is also destroying the only world that we have to inhabit.
What is your view on economics by the way?
Such as?….The same as with most other walks of life. That governments should begin with an aim of doing nothing and then do the very minimum that is absolutely necessary.
Defence, roads, providing for those who absolutely cannot (note, not will not), upholding some of the laws we have. There's obviously a need for government, but if they start with an honest attempt to do nothing I think we're most of the way there.Such as?….
That concocted definition of selfishness is just that. If your point is that those who work harder should get more rewards then I doubt anyone would disagree. To try and make this point by warping the meaning of the word selfish is just aberrant nonsense. So no, not everyone is selfish by the generally accepted definition of the word.The two are not exclusive.
Selfishness (in terms of economics) is wanting fair reward for one's ability, rather that receiving the same reward as the uneducated layabout who takes the easiest job for the least work.
Alain Ducasse can't cook every meal, Richard James can't make everyone's clothes, not everyone who kicks a ball can be Gary Doherty. Without the extremes of reward we lose the excellence that makes life interesting.
Some laws?…. Health? Education? Standards? Regulation? Innovation and investment?Defence, roads, providing for those who absolutely cannot (note, not will not), upholding some of the laws we have. There's obviously a need for government, but if they start with an honest attempt to do nothing I think we're most of the way there.