Yep I purposely used "my experience" rather than speaking in absolutes.And your experience is? Mine is otherwise. Its the nature of these things.
The rest is PR.
Yep I purposely used "my experience" rather than speaking in absolutes.And your experience is? Mine is otherwise. Its the nature of these things.
The rest is PR.
So, there are 23 Tory MPs who have said they will not vote for May's deal if it comes up again (letter to The Telegraph):
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion...ral-course-mps-wish-honour-referendum-result/
We believe that, if Britain leaves the European Union as planned on March 29, “no deal” will prove to be the precursor to a very good deal indeed.
At the time of the 2016 referendum, the choice was between leaving the EU (Brexit) and remaining within it. After remainers lost the referendum, they set up a new choice between “hard” and “soft” Brexit – in reality, between real departure and leaving in name only. Now, “hard/real” Brexit has been redefined as a “catastrophic no-deal Brexit” and purportedly removed from the table by a parliament of remainers who hold a country with a majority of Leavers in contempt.
Charles Moore concludes (Comment, March 16) that Brexiteers like us now face only the “two wretched options” of Brexit in name only or the indefinite postponement of any Brexit, and says that he does not envy our dilemma in choosing between them. Yet our moral course is clear: it is not our fault that we are confronted by two unacceptable choices, but it will be our fault if we cast a positive vote in favour of either for fear of the other.
Here are the names of the 23 Tories who signed the Telegraph letter: Adam Afriyie, Lucy Allan, Crispin Blunt, Peter Bone, Andrew Bridgen, Richard Drax, Mark Francois, Marcus Fysh, Chris Green, Adam Holloway, Philip Hollobone, Ranil Jayawardena, Andrea Jenkyns, David Jones, Dr Julian Lewis, Craig Mackinlay, Sheryll Murray, Owen Paterson, Sir John Redwood, Andrew Rosindell, Ross Thomson, Michael Tomlinson and Anne-Marie Trevelyan.
__________
I'm not entirely sure where that leaves things for May, how many Labour minds she has to change (along with the DUP) to get it through, should she even choose to put her deal to a vote again.
I wonder how many (if any, but potentially from all sides) are planning on pushing it right to the wire, i.e. a potentially 4th vote? If a 3rd vote happens and fails, there would then be the EU summit between it and a 4th vote. Johnson himself has suggested that another vote is pointless without further negotiation the EU, which even if there were to be any, won't happen before the summit. I wonder therefore if some are witholding support with this in mind?
Plenty have. I have.
2 years ago talk of a second referendum was preposterous.
Now, given a deal is not found, given the house is divided, given the parties are divided and we seem on course for not only not really leaving* but a decidedly worse result than was wanted - checking with the people if that is the desired outcome (or "what" is the desired outcome) doesnt seem unreasonable at all.
*I know you will like to argue technicalities on what constitutes leave, but pedantry aside you know exactly what I mean.
And even then the EU dont have to grant it. They have already said any request needs to be accompanied by a plan. And Im not sure "so we can go and do what we should have done these last two years..." counts.
May did say that if her deal didn't pass this week, she would go and ask the EU for a "long extension."
You might get a 2nd referendum, but I'm not sure it will ask the question you want it to ask. I'm thinking that if Parliament has rejected "no-deal" then the referendum question (should we actually get there) would be between a deal that Parliament has ratified and remain -- which is what the Kyle-Wilson amendment calls for and that is (probably) going to have the support of Labour.
And even then the EU dont have to grant it. They have already said any request needs to be accompanied by a plan. And Im not sure "so we can go and do what we should have done these last two years..." counts.
The first one was terribly worded so I wouldnt be surprised.
Point being, we have a negotiated deal with the EU. And we have the option to revoke. And the option to leave anyway with WTO terms. There is already plenty to choose from.
Parliament couldnt agree on the time of day, if there is a deal they do agree on itll be the softest most vanilla of brexit possible. Not really a choice at all, remain, or leave in name only...
Now THAT would be a betrayal, IMHO.
Thats really the difference - referendum now is actually a choice, later isnt. But, Corbyn and co will be hoping that by then they will have power which is really the priority for them. I wonder how his great reforms would work when the EU wont allow them and we have no voice in the club...
...Not really a choice at all, remain, or leave in name only...
Now THAT would be a betrayal, IMHO.
We could see a vote of confidence called in the government at that point and possibly another GE (which would be grounds for a long extension). Now there have been some noises from the ERG that some of them might be prepared to vote with Labour in a confidence motion against the government (I am guessing that a big delay to Brexit would be too much of a betrayal for some of them -- which is a kind of circular argument, I grant you).
We might finally be getting to the end of the beginning
And I think I heard Farage say he's going to try and drum up a veto from within the EU...!
But that surely isn't a desired outcome for her. Sounds like a fairly weak attempt to paint a 3rd vote as a final chance
I think you are probably right. But (from what I've just been reading anyway) she said that if her deal doesn't pass this week, she will seek a long extension from the EU and get Parliament to vote on that extension next week.
Just when you thought she had run out of road to kick the can...
...If (or while) the deal remains the same
Tell me where Im wrong:
- Vote of no confidence
- General election
- Labour win with a minority
- Labour get in bed with SNP just as the Tories have DUP (with now the whole Scottish independence thing being back on the agenda - lots of fun in the not too distant...)
- Corbyn tried to negotiate a customs union whereby we get to have a say in EU trade policy and gets laughed out of town
- Ends up with a bastard awful deal, almost certainly BINO and also almost certainly compromising on FoM.
- This, unsurprisingly, isnt a popular option and where are we?
- Right back where we are now!
- EU now at the end of their tether asking what the actual fudge are we doing
- UK population sharing the sentiment
She has also already said she wont be party leader for the next election hasnt she? Im wondering if she will do a Cameron and step down so someone else can pick up the pieces...
The Speaker says ‘no third vote’.