• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

Sure, there will be examples of it. But the tone on this thread is consistently something else - can appreciate with some of the subject matters things are going to get heated at times, but still. Anyway, nothing I say is going to change anything, but do agree with Finney on this one.

Some very good points get shouted down/ridiculed easily on this thread which is a shame. Enjoy reading a lot of the discussion you and others have on here nonetheless....
It's the culture wars, innit.
 
I'm not going to highlight individual posts and posters for this, not that it would be that difficult. I agree with Finney - if you don't that's cool, no biggie :)....

Fair enough. I was just looking to learn

It would be great if people looked to be better than what they're allowed to be mate.

People are more offended at being called a bellend than being accused of bigotry. But OK I'll hear you big bro
 
Making rich people pay some tax? Focusing on society and community, rather than fluffing corporate oligarchs? The terror!
Rich people pay more tax than anyone else, quick google, 2023 to 2024 tax year:

Income tax revenue:
- top 1% of earners pay c. 30% of all income tax, a percentage that is at its highest level in 20 years.
- top 10% of earners pay c. 60% of all income tax.
- the top 0.1% of earners pay more income tax than the bottom 50% of earners combined.

Fairness:
The top 1% share of total income is c. 13% but they pay 30% of all income tax.

Those earning over £200k a year or holding over £2 million in assets paid 25% of all UK tax revenue from personal taxes (including income tax).

Moving on to discuss the green's wealth tax policies, wealth taxes are almost always bad and never achieve what they set out to achieve. Many countries that implemented them have withdrawn them.

In terms of the Green's proposed tax of 1% on all assets above £10 million, to see how much the devil would be in the detail of this policy and how potentially unworkable it would be, i will just discuss the issue of how you'd deal with shares in a limited company:

I am Mr A. I have set up a new business using inheritance of £100k and a bank loan of another £100k.

I incorporate a limited company, A Limited, which issue to me 100 ordinary shares with a fully paid up value of £1 a share.

After a number of years the business has taken off. I am managing to pay myself a director's salary of £100K a year and dividends of £50k a year. I employ 15 people full time.

I receive an offer from a large business in my sector to buy the business for £20 million. I reject the offer because i want to continue growing the business and i get my own valuation done that values the business at £30 million. My ownership of the business still manifests itself as 100 £1 ordinary shares.

How are you treating Mr A's ownership of A Limited for the purposes of this wealth tax?

If it is wealth of £100 then the wealth tax is completely worthless and will easily be avoided.

If it is £30 million, then you are asking Mr A to find £300K when he only earns £150K. Even if he scrapes the money together HMRC will be back for another £300K the next year.

You have totally disincentivised business and growth...
 
Back