• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

The CPS are shocking.

This is an absolute shocker and both the police and CPS should be ashamed this case ever came to court.
The case concerns Simon Correria, 48, director of a luxury watch brand, who, with his wife, was at the London’s Park Plaza Hotel, Riverbank, for an awards evening.
The Mail on Sunday reports a male waiter carrying drinks was about to back into him so Mr Correria put his hand on his back to warn him.
That waiter, a Muslim man, then claimed he had been abused and a finger penetrated him.
Mr Correria , from Liverpool, protested his innocence and footage from mutiple CCTV cameras in the hotel supported him.
Despite that, the police put a case together and the CPS said he should be charged with sexual assault.
Mr Correria’s life was put on hold for a year with him fearing his business career and the way he was perceived by friends, family and fellow workers, had been changed forever.
The waiter, a Muslim, said his religion meant he was “ very sensitive to this kind of thing”. He has received anonymity because he was an alleged sex victim.
Finally, a year later and it having cost him £10,000 in legal fees, the judge at London Crown Court threw out the case out in one hour 56 minutes.
The judge said the footage wholly contradicted the charges.
Mr Carreras, a father of two, wept when cleared and some of the jury shook his hand and they too cried.
There has never been an apology or explanation from either the police or CPS.
I think the solicitor who okayed this charge should be named and be forced to explain why he or she thought it right that this case be brought.
Was it because the waiter was a Muslim? This whole case stinks.
The Police and CPS are both under a direction from government that allegations of *struggle cuddle* and sexual assault should be progressed based on the victim being believed and these cases should not be closed due to lack of evidence. This was to counter the extremely poor conviction rate of *struggle cuddle* and sexual assault cases which are 90% "he said/she said" or in this case "he said/he said". This isn't the CPS's fault or the Police's fault, they've been told that for sexual assault or *struggle cuddle* allegations, they need to get them in front of a jury and evidence-based investigation decision-making shouldn't be used.
 
The CPS are shocking.

This is an absolute shocker and both the police and CPS should be ashamed this case ever came to court.
The case concerns Simon Correria, 48, director of a luxury watch brand, who, with his wife, was at the London’s Park Plaza Hotel, Riverbank, for an awards evening.
The Mail on Sunday reports a male waiter carrying drinks was about to back into him so Mr Correria put his hand on his back to warn him.
That waiter, a Muslim man, then claimed he had been abused and a finger penetrated him.
Mr Correria , from Liverpool, protested his innocence and footage from mutiple CCTV cameras in the hotel supported him.
Despite that, the police put a case together and the CPS said he should be charged with sexual assault.
Mr Correria’s life was put on hold for a year with him fearing his business career and the way he was perceived by friends, family and fellow workers, had been changed forever.
The waiter, a Muslim, said his religion meant he was “ very sensitive to this kind of thing”. He has received anonymity because he was an alleged sex victim.
Finally, a year later and it having cost him £10,000 in legal fees, the judge at London Crown Court threw out the case out in one hour 56 minutes.
The judge said the footage wholly contradicted the charges.
Mr Carreras, a father of two, wept when cleared and some of the jury shook his hand and they too cried.
There has never been an apology or explanation from either the police or CPS.
I think the solicitor who okayed this charge should be named and be forced to explain why he or she thought it right that this case be brought.
Was it because the waiter was a Muslim? This whole case stinks.

The world has gone nuts.
 
Sexual assault prosecution rates are often impossible to deal with.
S/he said-s/he said. Often no witnesses. Even if there is strong evidence you can have a greenwood situation where they withdraw/change their statement accusation as they "love them".

Not sure what you can do other than treat each allegation seriously. But you can't treat someone as automatically guilty until it is dealt with in court.

For me i will ignore anything in the media. Wait for the verdict.
 
Sexual assault prosecution rates are often impossible to deal with.
S/he said-s/he said. Often no witnesses. Even if there is strong evidence you can have a greenwood situation where they withdraw/change their statement accusation as they "love them".

Not sure what you can do other than treat each allegation seriously. But you can't treat someone as automatically guilty until it is dealt with in court.

For me i will ignore anything in the media. Wait for the verdict.

Yep, this is a fairly grounded take https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c51yezl2dqlo
 

And the issue is the women can go through an ordeal in court with no guarantee of a guilty verdict. All the women that do decide to go through with it should be applauded. I do also think both the accuser and the accused should have their right to anonymity until a verdict is announced. How many people get their name dragged through the mud and companies drop them like a hot potato only to be found innocent! Johnny Depp comes to mind.
 
Back