• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

SpiderSpurs said:
Looks like a cash for questions 'scandal' incoming, involving Labour MP Navendu Mishra.
Click to expand...
Normally, a government has a honeymoon period. With this lot they've decided not to fudge about and get right on with the blatant corruption, mass protest and generally p***ing everyone off while collapsing the economy (market analysts now predicting UK inflation to hit 3% next year)

"Siri, show me what would have happened had Liz Truss lasted longer than a lettuce"
 
markysimmo said:
Absolutely outstanding Kier

View attachment 18069
Click to expand...

Can't say I've been overly impressed with labour, but I don't think they've been terrible, but what exactly are people expecting?
The country is a dumpster fire and has been for a number years, the economy is under stress for reasons outwith their control (as it was with the tories), no party was coming in and turning it around in a few months.
 
P.D. said:
Do any of you follow Dan Neidle on twitter? He's actually a labour advisor but writes really good tax info. Worth reading this whole thread and puts in perspective how dumb the employers NI increase was.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1859570425128165458
Click to expand...
I don't, but know of him. He's a tax lawyer isn't he? The one who outed Zahawi about his Gibraltar scheme? I think that sums it up though, that Labour members that know how the economy works/are in business are pulling their hair out.
glasgowspur said:
Can't say I've been overly impressed with labour, but I don't think they've been terrible, but what exactly are people expecting?
The country is a dumpster fire and has been for a number years, the economy is under stress for reasons outwith their control (as it was with the tories), no party was coming in and turning it around in a few months.
Click to expand...
Disagree. Sunak and Hunt were doing an excellent job on the economy. Things were improving, inflation falling, growth outperforming expectations, confidence increasing. The UK was genuinely seen as a shining beacon of economic stability in the west. Labour had a golden opportunity as this international confidence increased after the election as they thought they'd continue the economic policies, but with a huge majority and an end to the infighting and scandal that plagued the tories in the last few years. That confidence has been wiped out very quickly, the UK is being risk assessed downwards, growth forecasts are down, growth IS down in the first quarter of the new government, inflation is rising - its direction of travel - Sunak/Hunt still had a long way to go, but were going in the right direction. Starmer/Reeves have hijacked the vehicle and have accidentally stuck in in reverse.
 
Kompakted said:
I don't, but know of him. He's a tax lawyer isn't he? The one who outed Zahawi about his Gibraltar scheme? I think that sums it up though, that Labour members that know how the economy works/are in business are pulling their hair out.

Disagree. Sunak and Hunt were doing an excellent job on the economy. Things were improving, inflation falling, growth outperforming expectations, confidence increasing. The UK was genuinely seen as a shining beacon of economic stability in the west. Labour had a golden opportunity as this international confidence increased after the election as they thought they'd continue the economic policies, but with a huge majority and an end to the infighting and scandal that plagued the tories in the last few years. That confidence has been wiped out very quickly, the UK is being risk assessed downwards, growth forecasts are down, growth IS down in the first quarter of the new government, inflation is rising - its direction of travel - Sunak/Hunt still had a long way to go, but were going in the right direction. Starmer/Reeves have hijacked the vehicle and have accidentally stuck in in reverse.
Click to expand...

The conservatives were absolutely terrible and we all know full well they had not come clean about the difficult national finances.

Brexit then especially lockdown is the background, there is little point naming and shaming individuals.

But be absolutely certain they would have been wholly hamstrung had they been elected- but they were roundly thrashed and deservedly so.

The issue I have with Labour is that they are sucking up national wealth to build a bigger state which surely we all know is hopelessly inefficient. The taxes are impacting private sector workers who are already at a massive disadvantage.
 
glasgowspur said:
Can't say I've been overly impressed with labour, but I don't think they've been terrible, but what exactly are people expecting?
The country is a dumpster fire and has been for a number years, the economy is under stress for reasons outwith their control (as it was with the tories), no party was coming in and turning it around in a few months.
Click to expand...
4 3/4 years till an election too, so why do they care. tinkle off the right wing press now, then land their big successes later in the decade.
 
johnola said:
The issue I have with Labour is that they are sucking up national wealth to build a bigger state which surely we all know is hopelessly inefficient. The taxes are impacting private sector workers who are already at a massive disadvantage.
Click to expand...
That rebalance is massively needed. Much of the public sector is literally rationing heating and lighting and toilet roll, they've been so neglected for so long.
 
Kompakted said:
But as per scara's point, there's so much noise around poverty and what constitutes it, and the definitions and methodology changes so often, it's become almost impossible to track. That's down to government and the civil service.

You see you admit yourself that things are incomparably better than since Victorian times, which was only actually just over 120 years ago. You've also said that we can't really use the 1980s as a comparison because again, things have moved on so much.

Yet we have so many people out there that talk about the evil of neoliberalism and free-market capitalism, which largely originated and grew in the Victorian era and how Thatcherism destroyed the country by making the working classes swap pit-work, industrial disease and unheated back to back housing for warm call centres, retail and new-build housing association stock.

I mean, I saw some twonk face about a year ago that claimed Britain had never had a more unequal society. Thought briefly about a brief Alan Partridge style medieval history lesson before thinking better of it and asking what the meeting agenda was instead.
Click to expand...

Poverty has absolutely not become ‘almost impossible to track’ unless you want it to be.
Inequity should be measured by the present not the past.
How is the equity of society today?
We’ve discussed ‘free-market capitalism’ before; I referred to the current model as ‘steroided’ capitalism. The US public is about to find out what happens when you give a bunch of billionaires carte blanche over a nation; are you going to seriously tell me that a sense of benevolent duty will see those characters magically improve the lives of EVERYONE? Give me a break.

Genuine question. Have you ever been in a situation of poverty? If not poverty, hand-to-mouth life?
 
thfcsteff said:
Genuine question. Have you ever been in a situation of poverty? If not poverty, hand-to-mouth life?
Click to expand...
Here's a more relevant question.

What proportion of those described as "in poverty" by Labour, charities, etc are actually struggling to the extent you describe?

Now let's put that to one side for a minute and pretend this "relative poverty" measure actually matters or means anything (it doesn't). Would you say that policies making employers less likely to employ people (link) and policies making it more expensive to employ people (link) are going to improve or exacerbate the "problem"?
 
scaramanga said:
Here's a more relevant question.

What proportion of those described as "in poverty" by Labour, charities, etc are actually struggling to the extent you describe?

Now let's put that to one side for a minute and pretend this "relative poverty" measure actually matters or means anything (it doesn't). Would you say that policies making employers less likely to employ people (link) and policies making it more expensive to employ people (link) are going to improve or exacerbate the "problem"?
Click to expand...

If your own eyes don't tell you, this might help.

https://www.jrf.org.uk/uk-poverty-2...ext=More than 1 in 5,nearly 3 in 10) children

It depends on who is employing and what sort of business they want to run. If it is one where workers should be squeezed like teabags and squeezed again until they have nothing, then indeed, the 'problem' might well be exacerbated. Everything in that first link is excellent. Zero hours contracts are a disgrace.
 
Kompakted said:
I don't, but know of him. He's a tax lawyer isn't he? The one who outed Zahawi about his Gibraltar scheme? I think that sums it up though, that Labour members that know how the economy works/are in business are pulling their hair out.
Click to expand...

Yeah tax and policy, his commentary is pretty neutral and easy to understand. Income tax is the most progressive tax we have, much more effective to raise it. Instead the greatest impact is now on low earners. Likely there's more to come as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back